top of page
Zodiac Chart

OCCULTISM

Appearances

MAGIC AND RITUAL

Essays on the theory and practice of magic.

Magical Theory

Magic works by setting a powerful intention and projecting it out into the universe with enough force that it manifests. I know that’s a lot to comprehend, but I’ll try to break it down — intention + willpower + [divine power] = manifested result. So, to use a simple analogy, imagine that you go into a test at school and you are convinced that you will fail it. You don’t understand the material, you haven’t done well with it previously, and you definitely don’t expect it to turn out too well. One response to that might be, “Not with that attitude.” If you go into something with the assumption that you will fail, then you’ve essentially doomed yourself. You create a self-fulfilling prophecy. If, however, you go into the test with the expectation that you will succeed, you may find that you at least do better than you thought you were going to. If you go into most of your endeavors in life with the expectation that you will succeed, you may find success around every corner, just from having changed your mindset. That’s a well-known mental trick. It’s right up there with “if you smile more, you’ll be happier” or the “growth mindset” philosophy. Making subtle changes to our psychological outlook can change a lot about our lives, since much of reality is based on our perceptions, and our perceptions are based around our preconceived notions about ourselves and about what the world is “supposed” to be like. Magic is this same kind of idea, but on a much grander scale. It is, however, more complicated than that. Magic requires more than just a desire and an intent, it also requires a lot of power. It’s very, very difficult to simply change your mental state without years of practice and psychological self-analysis. The self-analysis is a tool to help break down your preconceived notions and methodically change them, which requires an insane amount of self-awareness. It’s effectively doing therapy on yourself. That’s a topic of its own to cover. Rituals, and the other practices associated with magic, are ways of putting you in the proper mental state and giving you the power you need. Practitioners of magic tend to believe that magical power comes from four main sources: Correspondences: The concept of correspondences is very old, and still is a foundational element of modern magic. In the Middle Ages it was believed that plants, stones, and other natural materials had inherent “virtues,” i.e. magical powers. A very important concept in magic is “Like attracts like.” If you group together enough “like” things that match the nature of your intention, then you can impress your desire upon the world and cause it to manifest. Planetary correspondences are especially popular in Western occultism — each planet rules a different part of life, and if you group together enough things that the planet rules, then you can harness its influence to make the desired changes in your life. So, if you wanted to do a spell to do well on a test, you’d need the influence of Mercury, which rules the intellect. You would perform the spell on a Wednesday, during the appropriate hour, ideally when the moon is in Gemini. You would wear yellow, and wear the symbol for Mercury. You would use a hazel wand, burn sandalwood incense and a yellow candle, and make a talisman out of aluminum or platinum with Mercury’s sigil on it. The materials themselves do two things: they harness the influence of Mercury, and they also act as physical objects to focus your intention on. You’re actually trying to boost your intellect, which is a non-physical thing, but it’s always easier to interact with physical things than non-physical things. Planetary influences are also related to an important occult maxim, the Hermetic Principle of Correspondence, usually summed up by saying “As above, so below.” This means that the macrocosm (the universe at large) affects the microcosm (human life on earth), and vice-versa. That means that if you affect one, you affect the other. This is the idea behind astrology — the positions of the stars and planets reflect or affect life on Earth. So, if you gather together things that represent Mercury (microcosm), then you harness the energy of Mercury (macrocosm), which will give you the desired result that falls under its influence (microcosm). Related to this is the concept of sympathetic magic. You may have heard of “voodoo dolls.” This is something of an offensive stereotype because Voodoo is a religion, but poppets (the dolls) and the idea behind them are a real thing. A “sympathetic link” is a magical connection between a symbol and the thing it’s supposed to represent. You use the symbol to represent your desire, and then interact with the symbol, which will cause the same effect on the thing it represents. Poppets are the most famous example, so I’ll use that. You would get a bit of hair or dry skin or saliva from a person and put it in the doll, to establish the sympathetic link between the person and the doll, and then you stuff the doll will herbs so that the person’s illness will heal. It doesn’t have to be dolls, though. You could write a person’s name on a piece of paper and then burn it or tear it up to banish that person’s influence in your life (i.e. getting over an ex, or getting rid of a toxic friendship). Or, you could have a candle of the appropriate color represent your desire, anoint it with appropriate oil, and as the candle burns down, you get what you desire. Carrying beans in your purse will attract wealth to you because you’re treating the beans like coins. Burying moss agate in your garden will make your plants grow because you’re treating the stone like a seed. Whatever you do to the symbol, you do to the target. Gods and divine powers: If you haven’t noticed, there’s a lot of overlap between occultism and paganism. A lot of modern occultists are some kind of pagan, and call upon the influence of gods and goddesses to help them with their spells. Evocation and invocation of gods and goddesses is really a whole separate topic, but with regards to spellcraft, calling upon a god’s influence can give an extra boost to your magic. To use the intellect spell example from above, if you wanted help from a god, you would evoke Hermes. You’ve already filled the room with things that Hermes likes, but you could add an offering or a hymn to Hermes to ensure he shows up. If he’s willing to help you, you could ask him to lend his power to the ritual, or turn responsibility for the spell over to him so that he will help it to manifest. Or you could invoke him (with permission), and perform the spell as Hermes, which is very powerful but also advanced. Gods can be an excellent and powerful source of magical power, but do not treat them as pools of free energy that you can pull from whenever it’s convenient for you. They hate that. Treat them as people — if not as kings and queens, then at least as colleagues. The Astral realm, the Earth, or the Universe at large: A third source of magical power is natural forces that aren’t necessarily deities. Some spiritual people use “The Universe” as a stand-in for God without all the baggage that comes with God, like a cosmic “worldsoul.” That works for some. Others treat the earth as a source of power, either as a deity or just as the planet itself, that gives life to everything that lives on it. So for example, you could imagine drawing energy up from the earth’s core and pushing it out through your hands or your wand. The sun and the moon are often treated this way, too. Even more common are the Four (or five) Elements — Earth, Air, Fire, Water, and spirit/anima/azoth/etc. — all of which have different correspondences and different alchemical properties. Physical representations of the elements will appear on the altar, but the Elements themselves don’t refer to literal (or “vulgar”) air, water, fire, earth, but to spiritual (“subtle” or “philosophical”) qualities or ideas. If you practice elemental magic, then you use the energy of these four forces to power your spells. Finally, you have the “Astral realm.” This is a general term for planes of reality that are not physical — the Otherworld, the Dreamtime, Faeryland… or “Aion” as I’ve begun calling it. Many occultists believe that this realm exists on some level and that it is separated from this world by a “veil.” Magic is easier there because everything there is made of ideas and thoughtforms, which can be more directly manipulated. You enter it when you dream, when you meditate, and when you astral project. Adept magicians will have ritual spaces or even entire homes in the Astral world that they built with their minds. It becomes another “macrocosm” — whatever workings you do there, manifest in the physical world. And vice-versa. You, and your emotions: In my opinion, this is the fundamental source of all magical power. Everything listed above is just there to make it easier. In magic, like attracts like, so whenever you cast any kind of spell you have to put yourself in an emotional state that aligns with your desire. This means acting like you already have what you want. You have to project the emotion of the thing you want out into the universe. Think of a Patronus Charm — to repel the soul-sucking depression of the Dementors, you have to project extreme happiness out at them. But, emotions are one of the hardest things to get control of. This is why rituals are helpful; they put you in the right emotional state through trance, meditation, and concentration techniques. Magic that is designed to bypass ritual, like sigil magic, requires you to have very fine-tuned control over your own emotions. This means that if you want a spell to, say, enhance your lover’s libido, you would have to pour your own lust into the sigil. Or, if you wanted a talisman that will make you happy when you carry it, you have to charge it at a time when you are overwhelmingly, ecstatically happy, so you can have that happiness energy in the sigil when you need it. I personally find this difficult, but your mileage may vary. It’s not enough just to throw some herbs in a bowl or burn a candle down, but it’s also not enough just to want something. This is the problem I have with the “law of attraction” philosophy — it has the intent part down, but not the power part. In order to be able to harness these powers, you need three things: Belief: If you don’t believe your magic will work, it won’t. This is because you’ll be sending out mixed messages. You want it to work, but you don’t actually think it will? Well, do you want it to work or don’t you? Without the sheer conviction that your magick will work, your intention is going to be garbled and you’ll lack the sufficient willpower. Confidence: A lack of confidence in yourself and in your own abilities can be really damaging if you’re attempting magick. If you don’t trust your own skills or knowledge, you won’t be able to accomplish anything with it. Similarly, you should be humble before the gods, but if you’re completely meek and don’t feel as if you’re worthy to be in their presence, they won’t take you seriously. Authority: Combine the above, and this is what you get. Whether you ascribe the credit to yourself, to the gods, or or to your materials, you are still the one wielding the power. That wand is a conductor’s baton with which you can orchestrate the universe. Why should gods and spirits even bother to listen to you if you don’t have the authority to speak with them, make requests of them, or even to command them? You are putting your studies into practice to get results like a trained scientist, or you are ordering the forces of the Universe to submit to your whims. Act like it! All that’s much easier said than done, obviously, and I’m still working towards it myself. It’s why you can’t become an expert at casting spells overnight. But, this is an example of the kind of mental shifts that I mentioned above. So, let it take its time! Where to start? So, if you’re a total beginner, all of that was probably a little overwhelming. You’re probably wondering what you should actually do first. Research. Research like hell. A lot of studying magic and occultism is scholarly work, and although it may be daunting, it can also be exciting and fascinating. If you use “witchcraft” as a keyword, you’ll be getting a lot about Wicca (or pseudo-Wicca), so branch out and use different keywords. Study folk magic from different cultures, traditional (Abrahamic) ceremonial magic, Hermeticism and alchemy, Kabbalah, neopagan theurgy (i.e. deity work), Chaos Magic, and everything in between. See what you feel attracted to and what makes sense to you. If deity work is your thing, research gods from around the world and learn about their native religions, to see if there are any you feel particularly drawn to. Buy books, read articles, and make sure to check your sources and cross-reference. There’s a lot of BS out there. Pay attention to the natural world. Witches are people who are very in-tune with the cycles of nature, and because they so often use natural sources (the earth, moon, sun, four elements) as power sources, observing nature becomes crucial for many. Pay attention to lunar phases. See how you feel when the moon is full vs. when it’s dark, and when it’s in each astrological sign. Get to know your local wildlife, and learn how to use common and local herbs in your magic. When you’re ready, do some ritual work on full and dark moons. See how those make you feel. Pay attention to the seasons and how energized or powerful you feel during each one. Practice meditation, visualization, and trance techniques. There’s a lot of different ways to meditate. You do not have to sit in a lotus pose. I meditate primarily by pacing back and forth. Find a way of going inside your head, and then get comfortable there. Explore your mindscape. A lot of magic is visualizing energy moving and then feeling it. Try visualizing fire — how it moves, how its heat feels on your skin, how bright it is, how it smells, how it crackles. Try visualizing water — how it moves, its coolness, how it feels to be submerged in it or to feel raindrops, surface tension, the sound of water moving. Try out different kinds of trance techniques until you find one you like (that’s also safe). Practice energy work. Learn to sense subtle “energies” or “vibrations” from things. Can you feel “vibes” coming off of people? Can you feel how they’re different depending on the person’s emotions? Can you feel the vibrations of trees and plants, of animals, of spirits? Try to manipulate this invisible “energy.” Rub your hands together until they feel hot, and then try to separate your hands and hold that “heat” between them in the shape of a ball. Can you throw the ball up and catch it again? Can you pass it to another person? Try “charging” it with the feeling of fire, then the feeling of water… does it feel different? Does it behave differently? Practice divination. If you’re a witch, you’re going to need to be proficient at some kind of divination technique. You have a lot of options. Many people start out with simple yes/no devices like pendulums, but tarot and oracle cards are really popular, rune stones are also popular, and scrying or automatic writing are very useful techniques to know if you want to do spirit work. Practice spellcraft. Study different kinds of spellcraft until you find one that works for you. Maybe you’ll want to perform a whole ritual with a formal invocation or evocation of a deity. Maybe you’d rather just anoint a candle and let it burn down. Maybe you like the idea of making charm bags or herbal sachets, maybe you really like traditional folk magic, or maybe you’d prefer the quick-and-dirty methods of sigil magic. Research different kinds of spells and try out a few low-stakes ones so you can get used to them. Build an altar: It’s helpful to have a ritual space where you can do whatever work related to magic. The basic altar tools in Wicca are the four tarot suits — a wand, a dagger, a cup, and a pentacle — with an incense burner and candles. Different kinds of occultists will have different things in their ritual spaces. Here are the basics, but you can technically put anything you want on your altar, or anything you value. I’ve got a zillion statues and idols all over mine. I hope that this gave you some useful information and a place to start.

Medieval Magic

“Magic” is notoriously difficult for scholars to define. There isn’t really any objective definition of it, because “magic” means different things to different people, and different cultures will interpret different things as “magic.” Scholars’ definitions of magic therefore tend to be context-dependent. What distinguishes “magic” from religion and from science? It overlaps with both categories, especially in the Middle Ages, when the lines between religion, magic, and science were very thin. Sometimes “magic” is defined by what its supernatural source allegedly is, sometimes it is defined by what the practitioner intends to do with it, sometimes by the methods that are used, sometimes by degrees of all three. One of the typical qualities of “magic” is that it’s stigmatized, if not straight-up otherized. The word “magic” itself originally referred to the Magi, Zoroastrian priests (as in the ones that went to visit Baby Jesus), and it had a sinister connotation in Greek. Magic is what those weird people over there do. So, Radcliffe Edmonds defines “magic” as “non-normative” ritual behavior — basically, magic is whatever a given culture thinks is too weird to be religion or science. Magic isn’t religion or science, it’s a secret third thing. It’s whatever practices, superstitions, and beliefs don’t fit neatly into either category. The medieval conception of magic was actually pretty rigid. In Magic in the Middle Ages, Richard Kieckhefer writes: "Broadly speaking, intellectuals in medieval Europe recognized two forms of magic: natural and demonic. Natural magic was not distinct from science, but rather a branch of science. It was the science that dealt with ‘occult virtues’ (or hidden powers) within nature. Demonic magic was not distinct from religion, but rather a perversion of religion. It was religion that turned people away from God and towards demons for their help in human affairs." —Richard Kieckhefer, Magic in the Middle Ages. Put another way by Benedek Láng in Unlocked Books: "Medieval commentators understood magic in one of two ways. The first magic as another, socially disapproved form of religion. If the approach was condemnatory, magic was seen as a perversion of religion, one that also operated with ritual tools, but one that, instead of abiding by the true aims of religion, tended to turn to demonic forces. The second tradition associated magical practice with science, and often presented it as an alternative, or mistaken (even bastard) science, emphasizing — in contrast to demonic intervention — the occult powers, natural forces, universal sympathies, and secret correspondences that it utilizes." —Benedek Láng, Unlocked Books: Manuscripts of Learned Magic in the Medieval Libraries of Central Europe. Demonic magic is fairly self-explanatory; it involved calling upon the power of demons in order to accomplish specific tasks. “Natural magic” sought to classify plants, stones, planets, animal parts, times of day, and other natural things according to a complex system of “correspondences,” so that each set of things would line up to produce or support a particular magical effect. For example, a love spell would need to be performed under the influence of Venus and on a Friday in order to work. “Natural magic” frequently overlapped with early herbal medicine; the medicinal effects of the chemicals in the plants were interpreted as being magical. According to Kieckhefer, natural magic was ironically more empirical that the “scientific” literature of its day, because it emphasized an experimental approach, whereas the scientific literature of the day instead pointed to ancient authorities like Aristotle or Galen, whose theories were incorrect. Theological authorities rejected the dichotomy between demonic and natural magic, because they insisted that all magic necessarily came from demons, no matter how innocent the practitioner was: "At the time, those who engaged in ceremonial magic would have been aware of two considerable problems with its public reputation. One was that in practice it overlapped with witchcraft as some of its texts contained rites designed to gain power over others and to injure or kill them. […] The other and larger problem was that mainstream Christian theology completely rejected the distinction between witchcraft and ceremonial magic, holding that all magical operations were effected (or apparently effected) by demons, and magicians therefore entered into a pact with those whether they realized it or not." —Ronald Hutton, The Witch: A History of Fear from Ancient Times to the Present. In this instance, the definition of magic is dependent entirely on where the magician’s supernatural power comes from, as opposed to the magician’s intentions or methods. No matter how pure the magician may be, all magic is automatically demonic by default, because if it were not demonic, it would be orthodox. A specific example that could shed some light on medieval ideas of magic is the Ars Notoria, one of the oldest in the “Solomonic” series of grimoires (magic books). Unlike later grimoires, the Ars Notoria doesn’t involve demons at all. It consists mainly of prayers, designed to impart an entire university education’s worth of knowledge directly into the practitioner’s mind, almost like the spiritual equivalent of downloading a skill into one’s brain in The Matrix. The prayers are contained within beautiful diagrams called notae, which are intended to be objects of contemplation, acting like a lightning rod that would draw the divine powers into the magician’s mind, so that the magician will magically receive knowledge of the liberal arts (rhetoric, grammar, arithmetic, geometry, music, astronomy, etc.) and be able to retain it forever. In a time when books were prohibitively expensive, university education was available only to a privileged few, and developing expertise in any subject took decades, that was a tempting offer. The Ars Notoria was very popular in the Middle Ages. The only role that spirits play in this text is as intermediaries who descend from God to impart the requested knowledge to the practitioner. The practitioner recites the secret names of angels who are associated with the specific disciplines that the practitioner wants to learn, and recites the prayers, which ask God to send the angels to impart the knowledge. Justin Sledge, the host of the ESOTERICA channel on YouTube, describes it as “rigorously, even athletically Christian, specifically Catholic in nature. The fasts are Lenten in quality, the prayer cycle mirrors the prayer hours, the orations and prayers could just be lifted right out of the text and wouldn’t appear magical in the least.” The only apparently “magical” features of the text are the mysterious angelic names and the striking, cryptic diagrams; the rest is standard Catholic liturgy with the innocent aim of acquiring wisdom and virtue (instead of forcing people to fall in love, or getting rich, or selfish stuff like that). And yet, despite the Notoria’s distinctly Christian character, it was still condemned by clerical authorities. Láng writes, "Official Christianity saw the magical reinterpretation of its own prayers as an intolerable abuse, refused to accept the notory art as a holy procedure, and found its aims—intellectual and mental perfection—dangerously ambitious. Nonetheless, its condemnations rarely turned into actual prosecutions […], a fact that explains how a number of high-quality manuscripts survived." —Benedek Láng, Unlocked Books: Manuscripts of Learned Magic in the Medieval Libraries of Central Europe. Use of the Notoria is not in and of itself worthy of persecution, but it is not officially sanctioned Catholic liturgy either, no matter how much it may look and sound like Catholic liturgy in isolation. So, what makes it magic? Part of it is the weird diagrams, and part of it is the equally-weird secret names of angels (both of which are very old magical techniques, the history of which stretches all the way back to Antiquity). But another big part of it is agency on the part of the practitioner: If one has the power to compel God Himself to do what one wants, then one is working magic, regardless of what the ritual itself consists of. The Notoria therefore seemed to some medieval commentators, including Thomas Aquinas, as something of a wolf in sheep’s clothing. It appears innocuous, but it is not. I personally like this definition of magic as being based on agency. Magic gives the practitioner direct control over supernatural forces, which they can manipulate according to their own will, rather than passively praying to supernatural beings who may or may not deign to follow through (which is what characterizes normative religion). There’s some flaws in this definition, but it’s a good benchmark, especially because it helps explain why magic is considered threatening by those in power.

So You Want to be a Witch?

Here’s some things that you should know, that I wish I figured out earlier: Wicca and witchcraft are not synonymous. A lot of books and websites concerning witchcraft, especially older sources, are going to make it sound like Wicca and witchcraft are the same thing. They are not. Wicca is a specific religion, while witchcraft is a more generic practice that anyone can participate in regardless of their belief system. Certain beliefs or practices that seem universal are actually specifically Wiccan: Worshipping the God and Goddess; rituals like “casting the circle” and the “Great Rite” (chalice and blade); saying things like “merry meet,” “blessed be,” and “so mote it be”; following the Rede (“An’ it harm none, do what ye will”) and adhering to the Rule of Three (what you put out comes back threefold). All of these ideas are Wiccan, not common to all witches. Historical misinformation abounds. Long story short, much of Wicca is based on outright historical fallacies. Although most Wiccans no longer take these “origin myths” literally, their influence is still felt, and if you’re anything like I was when I was thirteen, it can be difficult to distinguish the truths from the lies if you don’t know any better. So let me list out a few red flags: Anything about “pre-Christian matriarchies” is almost guaranteed to be false. Wicca is not the “Old Religion” — it was founded in 1951, and it can’t be any older than the late nineteenth century. Be suspicious of vague claims about “ancient people” or “ancient women” worshipping “the Goddess” — specificity is key! If a source makes a claim about an ancient civilization but can’t tell you which civilization, where, and when, or which specific deity they’re worshipping, don’t trust it. Be wary of Christian-bashing, and lines like “Christians stole our holidays,” because this usually isn’t true. Any mention of the “Burning Times” — the witch hunts happened in the early modern period (not the medieval period), but they did not explicitly target herbalists and cunning folk. Victims were disproportionately female, but not entirely. The death toll amounted to somewhere between 30,000 and 100,000, not nine million. The best resource I’ve found for all of these topics is Ronald Hutton’s books, The Witch and The Triumph of the Moon. His work is very credible, but it’s also very dense and scholarly, so it may be difficult to understand if you haven’t read any scholarship before. If any of your other books cite Hutton, the historical information in them is more likely to be accurate. Mention of primary sources is also a good sign. Develop good research skills, and learn to fact-check. Witchcraft is not the only kind of magic out there. Witchcraft is but a small subset of a wider field called occultism or esotericism. Occultism is, in brief, the study of magic in real life. Other occult systems include Solomonic magic, Hermeticism and alchemy, Kabbalah, Enochianism, Tantra, Chaos Magic, Thelema, hoodoo or conjure, the British “cunning” tradition, and shamanism. And that’s all just barely scratching the surface! A lot of these other systems intersect with witchcraft (for example, Wicca was influenced by Golden Dawn ceremonial magic, and Traditional Witchcraft owes a lot to the cunning tradition), but most of them are distinct traditions in their own right. Some of them are very lofty and spiritual traditions of mysticism within specific religions (like Kabbalah, which is Jewish, and Tantra, which is Hindu). Others are philosophical approaches, like Chaos Magic. Not all of these systems are available to just any person who comes along, but they’re all worth researching. You do not need to be pagan to be a witch. Witchcraft and neopaganism are seen as increasingly synonymous, again because of Wicca, but they’re not. Just as occultism is its own umbrella, paganism is a separate umbrella. The majority of neopagan religions are polytheistic, and most attempt some form of reconstruction of ancient religions. There are lots of neopagan religions, some of which are associated with witchcraft and others of which are not. Examples include Hellenism (Greek), Asatru and Heathenry (Norse), Kemeticism (Egyptian), and Neo-Druidry (Celtic). If you’re not interested in converting to a different religion, don’t feel like you have to. And be aware that there are lots of different kinds of paganism, so you have plenty of options! “Witch types” are fun, but arbitrary. A lot of witch-related content on the internet will place a huge emphasis on “witch types.” Green witch, hedge witch, cosmic witch, sea witch, urban witch, storm witch, kitchen witch, etc. etc. These are just aesthetic choices. They’re not names of traditions, types of magic, or really anything concrete. You can choose one if it speaks to you and you think it’s fun, but please don’t feel like you need to. And if none of them suit you, you can always make one up! Also, please don’t feel like you need to buy a ton of stuff to be a witch. It’s incredibly fun to buy stuff (I tend to empty my wallet in metaphysical shops, myself), but you’re in no way obligated to buy expensive gear to be a witch. Historical witches were often poor and/or marginalized people who had little power or resources, and they just used whatever tools, plants, and stones they had available! Baneful magic is okay to use in dire situations, but respect it. Curses and hexes are a weapon in your arsenal. You can use them if you feel seriously wronged, if you’re being bullied or screwed over or otherwise hurt by someone else. You can banish a person’s influence from your life, you can bind them to prevent them from hurting others, and you can force them to feel the pain that they’ve caused. But like any other weapon, baneful magic needs to be respected, and only used when necessary. Don’t throw hexes at every person who pisses you off, or use them to tear down someone who didn’t do anything wrong. Definitely don’t try to hex the moon. The one kind of magic I’d avoid entirely is love spells. Though you can use magic to draw or welcome new relationships into your life, you should never use magic to force someone to fall in love with you or force an ex to return. Doing so is a violation of their free will and consent, and definitely unethical. I’ve already mentioned what witchcraft is not, so let me go into more detail about what witchcraft is. Though witchcraft is not a religion, and witches can even be atheists, witchcraft is almost always a spiritual path. I’ve finally gotten around to studying witchcraft again, and based on the books I’m currently reading, witchcraft seems to consist of the following components: Spellwork. This is kind of a given, but specifically, witchcraft is “low” magic as opposed to “high” magic. “Low” magic is magic for practical, mundane purposes: luck, money, protection, purification, love, healing, etc. Witchcraft, as opposed to other kinds of magic, is always pragmatic and down-to-earth, and historical witches or cunning folk would have used this type of magic to benefit their communities — to quote Granny Weatherwax, “Stars is easy. People is hard.” Another term for this type of magic is folk magic, so if you need a keyword to search, search that instead of “witchcraft.” I’ve been looking into British and American folk magic, but every culture is going to have a tradition of folk magic. Most British and American spells developed within a Christian context, so they often make Biblical references, mention the names of saints or angels, include lines from psalms, etc. The British Book of Spells and Charms by Graham King is a book of real historical spells, but you’ll have to adapt them into something you can use. It’s generally more productive to learn to write your own spells than just following them like a recipe, but this takes some skill (that I still need to develop). Divination. This is using a combination of random chance and interpreting symbols in context to receive messages from the gods, or from your own subconscious. You should get good at at least one divination method. Tarot is one of the most popular and most accessible. All the witches I know have multiple decks of tarot cards! You could also give rune stones a try. I find these methods very effective for assessing the outcomes of spells and determining things about my own life (tarot is very therapeutic), but less useful for talking to gods. For talking to gods, I recommend automatic writing, which is writing a question and then writing whatever comes to mind as an answer. This lets the god talk to you directly. Scrying is also very effective for those who are more visual than me — this means staring into a blank object (like a crystal ball or a black mirror) and interpreting whatever visions you get. Pendulums answer yes/no questions only. Astrology can tell you a lot about your personality, if you interpret your whole natal chart and not just your Sun sign. Augury is interpreting signs in the environment, like the shapes of clouds or the number of magpies you see. There are almost innumerable methods of divination. You can even use random number generators for divination! “Hedge-crossing.” This means traveling to the Otherworld. The most common methods of doing this are meditation, astral projection, lucid dreaming, and using psychoactive substances. Use of substances should only be attempted with a trained professional shaman who knows exactly what they’re doing, so don’t try it at home. The rest, though, you could at least attempt. I can’t lucid dream and haven’t succeeded at astral projection, but I have some unique means of meditating that are very effective for me! I feel like I always have one foot in and one foot out of the Otherworld. If the methods you find in books aren’t working for you, I recommend ritualizing some repetitive, lulling movement that you already do. Play around and figure out what works for you. Reverence for Nature: Most witches try to be “in tune” with nature in one way or another. This means paying attention to your own environment — seasonal cycles, climate, native plant and animal species, etc. — and letting that influence your practice. Many witches are animistic, and believe that each natural object, living or nonliving, has a unique soul or spirit guardian that can be directly interacted with. Some also believe in fairies or elementals. Exactly what this looks like for you depends on what kind of environment you live in, but even if you’re in the middle of a big city, there’s always ways to connect to nature. These aren’t the only practices that witches might engage in (plenty of witches also practice high magic, for example), but when you separate out everything from a specific tradition and are left with just witchcraft, this is what you get. I’m working on compiling a more detailed list of book recommendations as I go through my massive pile of unread occult books. For now, I recommend Hands-On Chaos Magic by Andrieh Vitimus, which is a very good practical guide to every kind of magic you’ll need to know. It’s detailed and comprehensive, so if you do all the exercises in it, you’ll have all the magical skills you’ll need. I recently read The Crooked Path by Kelden, which I thought was a useful beginners guide to a non-Wiccan version of witchcraft. I recommend you have at least one non-Wiccan book in addition to the Wiccan 101 books that you’ll inevitably have (if you don’t already), so you’re more aware of what your options are. I also recently read The Witch’s Path by Thorn Mooney, a Wiccan high priestess who wrote this book specifically to help witches like me who are experiencing burnout or who don’t know where to start. I’m currently reading New World Witchery, a guide to North American folk magic by a scholar in the field that is accessible and straightforward. I’m really enjoying it, and it’s promising so far! Finally, I’m personally a fan of Nocturnal Witchcraft by Konstantinos. It was one of the first guides to more advanced kinds of magic that I ever read! But it’s specifically geared towards darkly-inclined people, and I’m not sure if you’re a dark-and-spooky type. If you’re a budding theurgist who wants to work with gods and goddesses, make sure to research those deities individually, too.

How to Spot Bad Occult Books

There’s a lot of dreck in the occult book section of the library (or bookstore, or Amazon). Filtering though it is partly trial-and-error, a matter of gaining experience and knowing what to look for and what not to look for. But I’ve got a few standards. Here’s my advice, based on learning it the hard way. Is it well-sourced? This is the biggest one. A lot of occult books will dispense complete bullshit about ancient religions and so forth, and until you learn to recognize it, you might take it seriously and repeat it on the internet. Check the bibliography. If the author mentions some ritual or belief from ancient times, ensure that they specify which culture, where, and when (at minimum). Fact-check rigorously. If the author is writing from their own UPG (personal experience with gods and whatnot), do they specify that? Or do they draw no distinction between UPG and fact? Do they name what older occult works they were influenced by? Some red flags to watch out for: “Nine million” witches being killed during the “Burning Times.” Anything concerning pre-Christian matriarchies. Claims of ancient origins without anthropological evidence. “Grandmother stories.” Conflating gods and goddesses; treating myths from different cultures as identical. Anything gatekeepy (outside if very specific situations, like certain closed practices or initiatory groups). Telling you that you’re special and all the “mundies” won’t understand you. What tradition does it work within? This can be hard to tell until you’re more well-versed. Your average fluffy Wicca 101 book is very different from an edgy book of demonolatry. Personally, I’d stay away from generic “witchcraft” books that are based in Wicca even though they don’t say so. If you want ceremonial magic, search for books on ceremonial magic. If you want alchemy, search for alchemy. Astrology, herbalism, mediumship, folk magic, etc. etc. Go for depth over breadth. I’m not trying to say that eclecticism is bad — I’m eclectic myself, but I take the chaote’s approach of diving deep into everything and then combining them. The only general book I’d recommend is Hands-On Chaos Magic by Andrieh Vitimus, specifically because it takes this approach and is otherwise non-denominational. Avoid any attempt to discredit Christianity. Kind of a given with Satanic material, so that gets a pass, but nothing else does. There’s no reason to bitch about Christianity in a book on paganism. Even less so in other kinds of occult texts, because so much of Western occultism developed within a Christian context. Be especially wary of any claim that Christianity was “copied” off of this or that pagan god or mystery religion. Take politics into account. How does the author treat other cultures? Are they respectful and well-researched, or do they treat them like a buffet bar? Are they writing about Native American religions or Voodou without being apart of either of those groups? On the flip side, Is there any warning sign of folkism? Do they defend their personal usage of Nazi symbols by saying “a god told me to”? Or are they so second-wave feminist that they tell you men can’t be witches, or make transphobic comments? If so, be careful. Notice how an author’s biases might color their work. Is the book useful? What do you get out of it? Can you actually do the spells and rituals in it? Is the author’s writing style approachable and down-to-earth, or is it so airy-fairy or esoteric that it’s alienating? Did you get anything out of this beyond bad history and a correspondence sheet? There’s no magic to this particular vetting process. Just good research skills. I recommend reading actual scholarship in addition to designated occult books.

Occultists are Both Born and Made

My go-to answer would be “of course you don’t have to be born into occultism,” but I’ve been reading a book on folk magic that provides a more nuanced take. Being born inherently magical is a genuine superstition and folkloric motif: "A person with a physical marking of any kind, especially from birth, could be considered a potential witch. This becomes even more complicated when you consider that in a lot of lore from southern states, a birthmark would have been caused by the child’s mother having a craving that she did not fulfill during the pregnancy — a strawberry-shaped birthmark might indicate the mother’s intense desire for strawberries, for example. Marks could also be broader, lumped into the category of “deformity,” or a physical handicap of some kind such as a club foot, cleft palate, or extra digit. Even heterochromia — having eyes of different colors — could be seen as a mark of enchantment. Not every such mark was negative, however. The fine line between being marked as someone with “gifts” versus someone who would become a witch was blurry and people traversed it frequently in lore. One of the prime examples of this sort of marking was the caul — a lingering amniotic membrane that would often surround part or all of a person’s head during childbirth. That caul would mark the child as someone with “second sight” in Appalachian communities, and in the seaside villages of New England, a dried and preserved caul might be bought by a sailor for protection from drowning. Julius Caesar was sometimes said to have been born with a caul, which marked him for greatness. […] Family connections play a significant role in a variety of stories of North American witchcraft. One of the first ways a family can “mark” a person as a potential witch […] is simply by giving birth to enough children to make it possible for one of them to take on a magical mantle. For example, one of the best ways to know someone will become a witch or possess magical powers in the mid-Atlantic, Appalachian, and Ozark mountain regions of the United States is to be the seventh son of a seventh son […] [who] would be exceptionally more likely to possess powers such as “water witching” (dowsing), fortune-telling or clairvoyance, and the power to “buy warts” by rubbing them with a penny or giving a coin to someone troubled with them. Other birth orders could also hold special power, with combinations of three, seven, and thirteens being potent, and youngest children often exhibiting special favor as well." —Cory Thomas Hutcheson, New World Witchery I’ve notice that this idea of being a “hereditary witch” or a “natural witch” remains extremely popular, and because there’s so much folklore about it, I wonder if it might have more merit than simply “wanting to be special” like a protagonist in a YA novel. A lot of people do get “magical” or folkloric knowledge from their grandparents (or other “tradition-bearers,” which Hutcheson says “is a term we folklorists use to describe people who know things). And some people definitely seem to have more natural affinity for witchcraft or other occult skills than others. I don’t think that these skills actually correspond to birthmarks, deformities, or genetic conditions like heterochromia or albinism, but I also wouldn’t know. I personally believe that everyone has some kind of untapped magical or psychic ability. Some people can see or hear spirits, some get flashes of the future, some have prophetic dreams, some are especially skilled at astral projection, some have an easier time with casting spells, some have a special connection with nature or with specific animals, some are especially intuitive, so on so forth. These kinds of inherent abilities aren’t limited to “natural-born” witches, and having them doesn’t mean that you are somehow more magical that everyone else. Most people have natural skills or talents in other areas, professional or recreational, so why should the occult be any different? And just as you can be strong in one area and weaker in another, the same is true here: I am extremely sensitive to the “vibration” or unique presence of spirits, and I can “hear” them speak in my mind, but I cannot see them and I can’t scry worth shit. I also don’t have spiritually significant dreams, and can’t lucid dream, even though I’d like to. For someone else, lucid dreaming and scrying may come easily, but theurgy or spellcraft may not. As a general rule, the stronger a psychic ability is, the harder it is to live with. The real answer to your question is, yes. Yes, people can be born into occult practices, but yes, anyone can learn them, and most of them require years of study regardless of whether you’re born into them or not. Whatever your skills are, you still need to develop them. This is where the concept of “hereditary witchcraft” becomes problematic. No matter who your grandmother was or what birthmarks you have, you are not more valid than any other practitioner. Having a leg up doesn’t make you an authority in your tradition, let alone anyone else’s. Thankfully, claiming to be a “hereditary witch” to gain Wiccan street cred seems to be less common now than it used to be. Other occult practices don’t seem to emphasize your birth as much as witchcraft does (maybe becuase witchcraft is intrinsically tied to folk traditions in a way that others are not). Instead, “high magic” systems like Hermeticism tend to place a heavier emphasis on initiation. It doesn’t matter how you were born, but it does matter that you spend this amount of time studying and gain these five degrees and master these ten rituals before we even begin to tell you anything. (Wicca does this too, being smack in the middle of the intersection between “high” and “low” magic.) This is, I think, the real dividing line between “high” and “low” magic: Low magic tends to take spiritual knowledge for granted. Everyone knows that the Little People exist; everyone knows that’s a euphemism, and you really don’t want to ever attract their attention. So, putting an iron horseshoe over your door or leaving cream (but nothing else) out in certain circumstances are just Things People Do, the same way you look both ways when you cross the street so a car doesn’t hit you. Everyone knows that you should give hospitality to strangers that show up on certain nights, because the pagan gods retain their power even if no one worships them anymore, and being a poor host offends them just as much now as it did back then. The eldritch is both real and in your face, so there’s no reason to go mad when you see it. You have a plan for it, the way you have a fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit and extra flashlights for when the lights go out. Folk magic assumes that there is no separation between magical and mundane life. Not so with high magic. High magic assumes that spiritual forces can be accessed and controlled by humans if they follow certain procedures, but the spiritual forces must be called up or otherwise pulled from whatever realm they inhabit. Or, you go to them. Even if the existence of spirits is equally self-evident, they are cut off from the rest of life — sometimes literally, by magic circles and sancta sanctorum. Any interaction you have with them comes from deliberate action on your part, which involves months of preparation and years, years of book-learning. Because you don’t already know any of this magic stuff from your grandmother or your normal life, you have to learn it all from scratch. And that means changing the way your mind works. I don’t have a lot of patience for formal initiatory systems, but I also understand why they exist. If your whole life has been “mundane” up until you decide to study magic, then you’re not going to have any idea how to process the “higher” spiritual information you will encounter. You might read every book you can get your hands on, but not have any idea how to interpret or apply the information in them. Initiation, and progressing through whatever degrees the system has, will restructure your brain to be able to receive and interpret information that would otherwise be beyond you. It's as the Ancient One says in Doctor Strange, “Have you seen that before in a gift shop?” What’s the first thing Dr. Strange does? He heads to the library and devours every book Wong throws at him (some of which are real), even while asleep! High magic is academic. Even as a self-study, I’ll say that studying the occult has required every bit of my scholarly acumen and then some. High magic material is dense and hard to understand even before you add back all the weird spiritual stuff. I still haven’t gotten through Levi’s Doctrine and Ritual. And a lot of high magic rituals are so complicated they’re just plain ridiculous. Folk magic doesn’t require super-academic thinking, since it’s traditionally passed down as an oral tradition by people who don’t have access to higher education. It’s meant to be practical for average people in average situations, not Faust-wannabes in ivory towers. But since I don’t have my own tradition of folk magic, I’ve had to study it as a whole, outside of any particular tradition. That requires studying folklore and tracing the origins of particular practices and superstitions, which is a field unto itself! I feel lucky that I have the skills needed to do that, and I completely understand why others might appreciate some formal mentorship. Either way, what ultimately makes one an occultist is wanting to be one, and starting to study. Like anything else, it requires dedication and takes a while, but it’s open to anyone. You don’t have to have a set of specialness-chosen-one criteria to be an occultist.

Why Most People Aren't Occultists

Occultism is hard! It’d be really stereotypical and a bit elitist for me to say that occultism weeds out all but the most worthy, but… it kinda does. Studying the occult is a commitment. Firstly, it’s a huge field, bigger than you might think. It’s enough of a project to dig through all of the available subsets of occultism before you land on one that really suits you. A lot of people just stick with whatever it was they encountered first, be it Wicca or Hermeticism or some form of folk magic, because it’s easier. It’s not like you’re presented with a bunch of different occult tracks, and pick a major. I’ve tried to make it easier for newbies by laying out all the systems I know of and providing a bit of basic information on each, so that they know there’s more out there than just WitchTok. But almost everything I know still falls under the banner of Western Esotericism, with nothing outside it. Then once you’ve found a system or subfield that you like, you have to actually study it. That takes years. I put the date of my “initiation” (as it were) at about thirteen, when I discovered Wicca. That was when I learned that witches were real, and that if I put the work in, I could be one. That was almost ten years ago! I’ve been studying this for a decade! When that sank in, I realized just how much I’ve managed to learn and to accomplish in that time, and I feel a little more justified in speaking with authority on occult subjects. Some of the occult podcasters, youtubers, and writers that I follow haven’t been in it that long! And yet, I still feel like I know basically nothing. Hell, I haven’t even gotten through The Doctrine and Ritual of High Magic yet. Half of the books on my suggested reading list are sitting on my shelf or in my pdf folder, unread or partially-read. "The well-informed student of occultism is one of the most universally learned of human beings. He must be acquainted with all of the important systems of world philosophy and religion, both Eastern and Western, and he must have a thorough understanding of ancient sciences and arts. There is no place for the superficial thinker in this field; and should he wander in by accident, or would be wise for him to depart in haste." — Manly P. Hall Occultism is almost more reading than it is anything else (to the point where a lot of occultists call The Ninth Gate one of the most accurate occult films purely because it involves a lot of pouring over an old book). It’s like deliberately choosing to do college-level coursework all the time. You have to have the time to read all those books, and you also have to have the money to buy them. Many occult texts are public domain and freely available online, but anything too weird and obscure is going to be hundreds of dollars on Amazon, assuming you can find them at all. And the material itself is dense, man. The Three Books of Occult Philosophy are definitive texts on Renaissance planetary magic and “natural magic,” but they are literally textbooks from hundreds of years ago and about as dry as you’d expect. Mystical texts like the Corpus Hermeticum are genuinely difficult to understand, and to a beginner who has had no mystical experiences to compare them against, they might be completely opaque. Grimoires are just plain weird. This, I realize, is the advantage of books like The Kybalion, which take higher and more complex ideas and distill them down into a format that’s digestible for beginners. But then you run into another problem — a lot of the simplified “beginner books” are just trash. At best, you lose the nuance, and a beginner who doesn’t know any better might mistake vapid truisms for profundity. At worst, you get outright misinformation. Learning to vett all this material takes years in and of itself, and I speak from experience there. Assuming you understand all this material, then you’re going to need to apply it. There’s nothing technically wrong with being an armchair magician, but most occultists are going to want to actually practice what they learn. That’s the whole point, isn’t it? Doing magic, taking command of your own life, becoming a supreme magus or witch-lord or demigod? An initiatory system will do this part for you by teaching you their liturgy and allowing you to participate in their rituals, according to a regular schedule that they set. If you’re not initiated anywhere, you have the freedom of practicing rituals however and whenever you like. But… good luck with that. Developing a practice from scratch is really really hard, and holding yourself to it is just as hard. A lot of systems, especially ceremonial magic, require very specific sets of materials and procedures that (at most) can take months of preparation. Ceremonial magic often requires the magician to fast and spiritually cleanse themself before attempting a ritual, and then it requires use of specific times and astrological events. Folk magic will often require very specific tools and sets of conditions, too. I took one look at that and went “well, fuck that.” I don’t have the patience for any of that crap. And, to my credit, I’ve had some pretty awesome and successful experiences without it. But I can’t help wondering if my desire to cut corners comes less from a desire to build an idiosyncratic practice, and more from my own lack of discipline. It’s probably both. Once you have your practice figured out, you have to… y’know… practice. You’re probably not going to cast a successful spell on your first try. You’re probably not going to astral project without months of meditation exercises. You’re probably not going to see or talk to a spirit the first time you call one up, unless you have that particular gift. Even the simplest of divination methods require practice. The magical equivalents of get-rich-quick schemes are almost all untrustworthy, if not dangerous, so don’t think it’ll come easy. And then you have the experience itself. If you are successful, you’ll be pushing up against grand eldritch forces beyond mortal comprehension. I’m not exaggerating. Mystical experiences can be earth-shattering and mind-breaking, especially if you’re new to them, and you may be feeling like your whole life is a lie. Don’t get me wrong, mystical experiences are amazing and leave you feeling like there’s fireworks going off in your brain and like you have the whole world at your fingertips. But to get there, you have to experience spiritual death and katabasis. Most people go out of their way to avoid working on themselves, but occultism will make you work on yourself. If you’ve made it this far, this is the point of no return. This is what separates the Initiates from the uninitiated. When things get dark and personal, will you get scared and turn back? Before your mind jumps to horror movies, what I’m describing here is more psychological than physical, more metaphorical than literal. You won’t end up with demons “attached” to you. You won’t come out of a ritual one day to find that your family is dead and your house has burned down. Bad stuff happening in real life is sometimes a catalyst for the kind of spiritual “death” that I’m describing, but not the only possible cause or a result of it. Even the risk of madness, while present, is probably overstated. The real risk is that you will be psychologically incapable of working through all of your baggage. That requires developing an uncomfortable amount of self-awareness. Actually, pretty much all of occultism requires gaining awareness of things that you would normally try to ignore, and whether Insight brings you enlightenment or madness depends on how you react to it. When all is said and done, what you’re left with is your own self, and your desires. What are you going to do with them? Being genuinely powerful, and taking responsibility for your own life, is scary. I sit here knowing that I could cast spells that will bring me a romantic partner, or ensure that I get into the graduate school that I want, or make Silksong come out this year. But I don’t cast them, because I’m not completely sure that’s what I want, and I assume I might regret the results. Overcoming the self-doubt and imposter syndrome is almost harder than Shadow work, because it pushes against the more natural and “logical” feeling that I am not special and that I don’t deserve any kind of special power. Until I get over that, I can’t do any magic. The only thing left to do is to claim my birthright as a child of the gods and dare to seize power. And after hearing all the cautionary tales, after having been humbled, after tempering my hubris… I can’t do it. I will one day, though.

Why I'm an Occultist

A few weeks ago, someone asked me what my beliefs about magic were and what my motivation was for studying it, pointing out that the reasons I offered were contradictory. When people ask, I usually say that I study occultism because it’s fun, and my post on The Egypt Game talked about ritual in the context of LARPing. A lot of my other answers, like this one, emphasize the importance of mystical experience, which is a big part of my practice. And then in some of my posts, I treat magic as if it’s a real supernatural force. So, which is it? It’s actually all three. I study occultism because I think it’s fun, because I enjoy connecting to the divine and seek secret knowledge, and because I think magic is real. On Fun “LARPing” is often used as a pejorative in the occult and pagan communities for people who allegedly don’t take their practice seriously. “LARPers” are people who like the idea of performing spooky rituals in robes, or like the idea of worshipping old gods, but don’t put in the work to approach either discipline properly. One of the things I like about The Egypt Game, which I pointed out in that post, is that the kids take their game dead seriously even while knowing it’s a game. They’re literally LARPing, but LARPing is treated like a weighty and borderline-mystical activity in and of itself. That is to say, LARPing and seriousness do not contradict each other. They’re not mutually exclusive, and they don’t cancel each other out. “LARPing” should not be used dismissively. The gods are not real in the book — I believe that my gods are real, but I still aim to approach them the way the children in the book do. Here’s how Thorn Mooney puts it in The Witch’s Path (which mentioned The Egypt Game and prompted me to reread it): "There’s been plenty written in the fields of psychology and education about the role that play fills in the development of children. Aside from encouraging creativity, autonomy, and dexterity, it actually helps with brain development itself. Play is no less important as we age. When I worked as a teacher, my seventeen- and eighteen-year-olds also required periods of play in the classroom to retain new knowledge, to regulate their moods, and to build relationships and cognitive connections. Play, it turns out, is serious business. Adults are often discouraged from engaging in play, unless it’s channeled into sanctioned sports and games. Dressing up and playing pretend becomes acceptable in theater, at Renaissance festivals, in cosplay, and in live-action role-playing (but even these things often draw derision from onlookers who think participants are questionable). But whether it’s Halloween costumes or football, video games or tabletop games, we all need to play in order to be healthy and happy. Ritual — as serious as it is — is also a form of play. It might involve costumes, special tools, the use of special names, unique rules, and skills that are equally at home on stage or film. Reciting memorized lines, altering the character of your voice, adopting a new persona, imagining new songs and poems, and plenty more besides are all strategies we use equally in pretend and in magic and ritual. The skills of Witchcraft are the skills of healthy, well-adjusted children, encouraged to play as they grow up. I believe this is one of the reasons why Witchcraft feels like “coming home” for so many of us. It’s either a return to a lost childhood, or else it’s the opportunity to experience the joy our childhood should have been. If you begin to think of your magical practice as play and you accept that play is healthy and necessary at all stages of life, then much of the anxiety surrounding respectability melts away. It becomes enough just to enjoy whatever you’re doing, be it dancing in your living room to celebrate May Day or wearing dramatic makeup to lead your coven in a full moon rite. Yes, invoking gods and summoning spirits is absolutely serious work, but it’s also fun. It’s cathartic and stimulating and empowering — exactly what play is for children. Sneaking into the woods at night, keeping secrets, waving a blade in the air, and lightning candles in the dark is fun, no matter how many exclusive initiations you’ve had or how old you get. Ask any ten-year-old. Allowing your Craft to be fun — to consciously be a form of play — will build your confidence, which in turn will make it more effective." —Thorn Mooney, The Witch’s Path So you see, practicing magic for fun does not preclude taking it seriously, and vice-versa. I have realized that fun is ultimately the reason why I practice occultism. It’s essentially an elaborate hobby — I don’t have to do it, I’m not getting paid, and it’s a ton of work. It requires about as much research as a dissertation, months of preparation, years of practice. It’s so much work that sometimes I have to pull back and remind myself that the reason I do it is because I enjoy it. When I find myself overcomplicating my approach, or getting really worked up about the theology of the gods I worship (damn those Neoplatonists), or feeling awkward or ashamed… I remind myself that I do this because it’s fun. I default to this explanation when talking about occultism and paganism to non-occultists/pagans because it is the simplest explanation, and it does three things: It’s hard to argue with. You can’t really tell someone to not find joy in something. It makes me seem harmless. If fun is my ultimate motivation, then I’m not going to go around trying to convince others of my beliefs or use my beliefs to attack people. It requires no convincing or further explanation. I embrace the idea of “LARPing” outside the occult and pagan communities because I know that I will not be taken seriously. Why should I bother to say that I believe that magic works, or that I believe the Greek gods literally exist, when I’ll just be laughed at? If someone wants to walk away from the conversation assuming that I don’t take any of it seriously, fine. I’d rather that, then be attacked or derided for believing in magic. You can probably understand why I lead with this, and not with why yes, I believe in curses. Again, it’s not a lie. But I think it might be more accurate to say that fun is my motivation rather than my reason for belief. On Mystical Experience Mystical experience is one of the major draws towards occultism for me, because secrets about the spiritual world and how it works are enticing. And unlike many occultists, I don’t intend to keep those secrets under wraps. I haven’t sworn any oaths, so I’m not obligated to keep any secrets. I post pretty much everything I learn or experience on the internet (unless it’s intensely personal), because I want other people to have this information too. I don’t proselytize — I don’t want to convince people of my perspective — but I do want my perspective to be out there, because it’s frequently so different from what’s familiar to most people. It’s my opinion that religion should be experiential. If I were designing a perfect world, then everyone in it would have their own personal avenue to God and, while they might come away with different ideas about what God is and how it works, they would also all have answers to those questions that personally suit them. Unfortunately, the world doesn’t work like this. Not everyone is capable of mystical experiences. Some people can become capable with years of dedication and study, often including isolation from the rest of the world so that they’re not distracted by “mundane” things, but then they’re too detached from everyone else to share what they’ve learned. Then you have the people who have mystical experiences but don’t know how to interpret them, so they use the experience to reinforce their established frameworks, instead of breaking them down and learning to think beyond them. In the worst cases, you have the people who have mystical experiences but never come down again — these people are insane, and cannot relate to the mundane world anymore. There’s plenty of people who claim to literally be gods (or whatnot) on the internet, but these people exist in real life as well, so they’re not all trolls. (I’ve written other posts about how to distinguish between UPG, insanity, and filters, so I won’t go into that here.) Mystical experience can be a double-edged sword. One of the bits of UPG that I’ve gotten is that it’s my personal gift to be able to have mystical experiences with very little formal training, interpret them, and then communicate them in ways that other people can understand. Most people are not like me in this regard. To borrow a phrase from Lovecraft, I can have mystical experiences and correlate all of their contents, without going crazy. This actually ties into the “fun” explanation: Mystical experiences are fantastic. At their best, they’re comparable to orgasm. Think about why people use psychedelic drugs. I can have those kinds of experiences without the drugs. I’ve never used drugs in my life. So, how do theater/LARPing/children’s games and mystical experience relate to each other? Honestly, that requires a full dissertation, but I want to take a moment to elaborate on the intersect between “playing pretend” and mystical experience. In brief, the former leads to the latter. Emotionally, the brain cannot tell the difference between a fake experience and a real one, which is why people get so immersed and emotionally invested in fiction despite knowing it’s not real. It’s why children treat the games they’re playing as if they’re real while they’re in them. It’s why BDSM can literally alter your state of consciousness and your way of relating to your partner (i.e. “subspace” or “Domspace”), even though the power dynamic is feigned. “Playing pretend” is an extremely powerful thing, and occultists take advantage of that. The reason that rituals have all the costumes, props, specific actions, etc. is because these things trick the mind into having a fake experience that, if it’s intense enough, becomes a real one. Occultists call this “psychodrama.” The psychodrama creates the conditions of an intense psychological experience through which the participants can be led straight into a mystical experience. Theater is actually a great example of this. The tradition of Western theater began as a literal Dionysian rite. Dionysus is the god associated with altered states of consciousness. Masks, which all actors wore in Greek theater, allow for a kind of figurative shapeshifting into another being, and that is a mystical experience. You’re in an altered state of consciousness when you play a character as an actor. You express a hidden aspect of your own identity through playing a character, and you’re given permission to do so through the anonymity granted by the (literal or figurative) mask. Theater grants the audience a new perspective on their own social dynamics through exploring taboos (tragedy) and speaking truth to power (comedy), which plays into the themes of social subversion that underlie all Dionysian experiences: "Masks express liminality in two ways. Modern interpreters tend to focus upon the mask's synchronic ambiguities: that a mask presents and conceals at once, combining an outward fixed personality and a mysterious hidden voluble one. The power of the masked personality resides in the possibility of difference, even polar opposition between the outside and the inside. On this interpretation, the masked icon is a representation of Dionysus' doubleness and duplicity. Indeed the Greeks also called him the "god of two forms," and this doubleness of the mask might also find expression in the fact that the icon of Dionysus is frequently a double mask — a pillar with two masks affixed to either side and gazing in opposite directions. The uncanny combination of something presented to view and something hidden suggests the portrait of Dionysus we find in myth, with its paradoxical combination of the familiar and the strange. Dionysus is a thoroughly Greek god, yet he is always presented as a foreigner arriving over land or over sea: from India, Lydia, or Thrace. The story of Dionysus at Thebes best brings out this opposition of familiarity and strangeness: Dionysus comes as a stranger from Lydia to his own birthplace to visit his own family. But the liminality of the mask may also be interpreted diachronically in terms of transition between states and identities. When you put on a mask you allow your own personality to be submerged in that of another. It is a form of possession and at least a partial expulsion of the familiar self. Frontisi-Ducroux argues that it is this, and not concealment, which the mask signified to the Greek mind: "When put on, the mask served not to hide the face it covered, but to abolish and replace it."l? If the logic of the mask's doubleness has to do with possession, there is also a certain doubleness in the manner in which the mask seizes its victims. The mask-wearer is invaded by the persona of the mask, but so is the mask-viewer. The mask is a source of fascination, even in the etymological sense of casting a spell (Lat. fascinare)." —Eric Csapo, “Riding the Phallus for Dionysus: Iconology, Ritual, and Gender-Role De/Construction Deconstruction and reconstruction of identity recurs again and again in initiation rituals and other kinds of mystical experiences. Mystical experiences force you to ask yourself who you are once you’ve stripped away everything that you think makes you, you — your public persona, your cultural identity, your gender identity, your age, your race, your species even. Those are all just masks that you wear. Who are you, when there is nothing left of you but the divine spark? And once you answer that question, once you become aware that all the other stuff about you is just various masks… you can start to change those masks at will. That gives you a great deal of power over how you’re perceived and how you interact with the world. But in order to use that power, you have to know who you really are without all the masks, or you risk letting the masks usurp your real self. That’s just one example. Most mystical rituals have some kind of symbol or play-acted situation that acts as a baseline for whatever abstraction the experience actually focuses on. In that example, masks are the go-to metaphor for figuring out one’s identity. Dionysus’ other symbols, like wine and phalloi, have similar mystical significance. Understanding the abstraction through the symbol is usually easier than understanding it on its own, so the rituals are built around the symbol. The fake situation (the symbol/psychodrama) becomes the real situation (the abstraction/mystical experience). On Magic Magic was the reason I got into occultism in the first place, though ironically, it’s aspect of occultism that I have the least experience with. I know the theory of how it works, and all the different methods of performing it, and all the different philosophical approaches toward it. But I don’t do very much magic. It’s only recently that I’ve remembered to do any magic, like, “oh yeah, magic is an option in this situation.” When I remember to do it, I have to override the feelings of self-doubt and self-consciousness that interfere with it. Working through those psychological blocks has been a challenge, and one possible tool to help me get through them is the psychodrama. That brings me back to The Egypt Game — approaching magic the same way I approached my imaginary games as a child will help me to switch off the rational-adult part of my mind that makes me second-guess myself. I have to believe that I’m powerful, which I have no trouble with when I’m LARPing or acting! And here’s the thing — when magic works, it works. It’s produced results enough times to convince me that something about it works, and while I know perfectly well that anecdotes are not data, and prove nothing, it’s enough to keep me invested in the practice of magic. Is magic supernatural? I don’t know, and I don’t claim to know. I frequently go back-and-forth on whether I believe in magic as a supernatural force or not. I’d really like it to be, but it’s also okay with me if magic is all a psychological trick and nothing more, because ultimately, it’s fun. It’s fun to believe in, fun to practice, fun to research. Likewise with gods — I’d like to believe that the gods are real, and I have reason to believe that they exist independently from me on some level. But the last thing I want is to get into arguments about what it means to be “real”, or about mythic literalism. If the gods exist only in my head, that does nothing to change the nature of my relationship with them, and it doesn’t take away from the benefits I get from my relationships with them, so what difference does it make? Magic as a concept is so important to me that I will accept anything as “magic,” even if it’s as simple as visualization. (However, my bar for magic is not quite as low as Crowley’s “a man blowing his nose is an act of magic.”) Through my studies, I discovered that magic is real in some sense, though exactly how I define it changes depending on the context and who my audience is. Sometimes I use the anthropological definition of magic, “non-normative ritual behavior.” Sometimes I use the occult definition of magic, which is usually some variant of “causing change in accordance with one’s will,” though exactly how broad of a scope that definition covers is a matter of debate. Some occultists believe that magic is purely psychological, while others believe that it’s genuinely supernatural, and there’s a lot of in-between. I’m not going to discuss every facet of that debate here, but I will say that I’m not all that invested in the conclusion. My solution has been to just not care. Nothing is true, everything is permitted. Magic could be real, or it might not be, but either way, it’s fun. What all of this ultimately amounts to is self-improvement on multiple levels. Obtaining mystical knowledge requires self-awareness and the ability to work through your crap, which improves you psychologically. That knowledge can then be applied to improve yourself on a spiritual level and a mundane level. You can gain a more sophisticated understanding of and connection to the Divine, or you can do simple spells to improve your health, wealth, relationships, and other aspects of your life. Or both! And then, of course, fun is healthy and a source of happiness, as Thorn so eloquently put it. All of that makes the study of occultism worth it.

Occult Maxims for Everyday Life

One is all, and all is one. / As above, so below. A summation of the Principle of Mentalism, the idea that the entire universe exists in the mind of God, and the Principle of Correspondence, that everything is inherently connected to everything else. I think this is probably the most important occult idea to remember as part of daily life. You are not separate from the rest of the world. You have an effect on the world around you, be it positive or negative. You can also deliberately influence the world in major ways if you choose to, by being aware of the ripple effects that your actions will have. Awareness of the interconnectedness of the universe helps to foster compassion and empathy. It also helps you to be more aware of the consequences of your own actions, so you can act more conscientiously. Everything we see, everyone we meet, is caught up in a great unseen flow. But it’s bigger than that. It’s the entire world. The entire universe, even! And compared to somethin’ as big as that, Al, you and I are tiny, not even the size of ants. Only one small part within the much greater flow. Nothing more than a fraction of the whole. But by putting all those ones together, you get one great all, just like Teacher said! The flow of this universe follows laws of such magnitude, that you and I can’t even imagine them. —Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood, Episode 12 Like attracts like. This concept has a lot of applications within the occult sphere, but within the context of daily life, it mostly means “you get what you give.” You get back what you put out into the world. If you work to spread love and positivity, you are going to get love and positivity back in turn. Likewise, being angry, upset, or anxious all the time tends to result in self-fulfilling prophecies. The gimmicky “law of attraction” concept is based on this; I’ve written before that actually manifesting what you want in life is more complicated than just wanting it, but the basic idea of focusing on what you want instead of what you don’t want is still a good one. A god suggested to me that whenever I get anxious about some impending doom, I should remember: “If I say everything is okay, it is.” This flies in the face of logic, which tells you that a person can’t simply command a hurricane or a war or a disease to stop. But anxiety is not logical. If I can state that everything is okay, and believe it, then anxiety and its impending doom will fizzle like nightmares upon waking. It’s the most powerful spell I can cast. And when I grow more practiced at it, who’s to say I can’t change reality with it? I create as I speak. If even one person sincerely believes that they can make everything okay by sheer willpower, then that is a step in the right direction for the whole world. To Know, to Will, to Dare, to Keep Silent This is sometimes called “the Witch’s Pyramid,” but the maxim predates Wicca. (I think it actually comes from Eliphas Levi, but don’t quote me on that.) It describes four required behaviors for every initiate. In the context of daily life, here’s how I would interpret them: To Know refers to knowing your shit. Pretty self-explanatory. Always do your research before drawing conclusions, and go out of your way to educate yourself whenever possible. Avoid speaking with authority on something you know nothing about. To Will refers to having an intention and the desire to follow it through. Know what you want out of life, and have the drive to get it. It doesn’t have to be a grand ambition, it can be as simple as the next step forward, or even something trivial. Keep yourself fixed on your goal, and believe that you have the power to achieve it. To Dare refers to stepping out of your comfort zone, and actually doing what needs to be done to achieve that goal. You’re never going to be able to accomplish anything if you’re too afraid to take a risk or use your imagination. You need some boldness in you to go on an adventure and claim the ultimate boon. To Keep Silent is the only one I take issue with — I do not believe that occult knowledge is only the province of initiates, and that everyone else is unworthy of it. That’s why I write about it on the internet. But I acknowledge that it is generally important to know when to speak and when not to speak. I’m going to add one, an occult maxim of my very own: See what’s there, not what you think is there. Your perceptions often lie to you. Your senses lie by interpreting only the important things in the environment, for the sake of your sanity, instead of consuming all possible information all the time. Your consciousness sometimes lies by writing off important information that your senses might pick up, e.g. oh, it was just the wind. Your intuition is more likely to perceive the truth of the matter, but trusting your intuition isn’t often enough. You need to learn to be able to see things as they are, when you want to. To cut through illusion, literal and figurative. To notice things that often go unnoticed, to be able to tell when other people are manipulating you, to just roll with the weirdness of life. You need to be able to see more than just what you want to see.

Appearances

Historical and Ethical Necromancy

Necromancy occupies a very weird place, culturally. It’s usually assumed to be pure evil. Evil sorcerers/esses or liches with armies of undead are a pretty obvious villainous archetype. Dark Lords are especially likely to be necromancers — Voldemort has a secret army of Inferi in his cave, and Sauron himself is called “the Necromancer” in The Hobbit. Necromancers are also likely to be hubristic, to view themselves as having absolute power over death itself, and might seek immortality (as Voldemort does). More tragic necromancers might be desperate to bring back a lost loved one, which is usually futile. Some necromancers reanimate corpses, while others control the very souls of their undead slaves. Necromancers aren’t automatically evil in all media — “Necromancer” is a character class in D&D, and some MMO’s like Wizard101 and Elder Scrolls Online offer “necromancer” as a character class — but explicitly good necromancers are very rare. The “why” is pretty straightforward. Death is scary, so scary characters are associated with death. The other main reason is that necromancers are guilty of desecration — they use dead bodies, who were presumably once someone’s loved ones, for their own purposes. They may even be grave robbers á la Frankenstein. They necessarily disrespect the sanctity of death, which is bound to make the death gods angry. Necromancy is forbidden because it’s a reversal of the fundamental laws of nature, and that never goes well. But I want to explore this in a little more depth, because necromancy actually has a very long and complicated real-life history. First of all, necromancy refers specifically to divination involving the dead. Traditional necromancy involves summoning the soul of the dead, usually by calling it back into its corpse, in order to ask it questions about the future and suchlike. This is the type of necromancy practiced by the Witch of Endor in the Bible. Mediumship is a modern version of this — that’s right, mediums are quite literally necromancers. A seance is a necromantic ritual. I know the most about necromancy in the context of Ancient Greece, and that’s what most of my resources concern, so that’s what I’ll be focusing on. The Bible takes a very dim view of necromancy, but necromantic divination had a more ambivalent reputation in Ancient Greece and Rome. On the one hand, you are supposed to leave the dead alone. On the other hand, sometimes you really need to talk to them. One famous example of nekyia is in The Odyssey, in which Odysseus goes to Hades to summon the shade of Tiresias and ask him questions. He ends up speaking with many other shades, including that of his mother and that of Achilles. This is a heroic example of nekyia. On the other hand, the necromancy practiced by Erictho in Roman literature is much more horrifying, because she actually reanimates corpses and utilizes dead body parts in her spells: Then she opened up the chest [of the corpse] with further wounds and filled it with seething blood. She rinsed the innards of corrupt matter and unstintingly administered moon-juice. In this was mixed whatever creature nature had produced under ill omen. Nothing was missing: not the foam of the water-fearing rabid dog, not the guts of the lynx, not the hump of the dreadful hyena, not the bone marrow of a deer pastured on snakes, not the ship-stopper, which detains a hull in the middle of the sea, while the east wind strains her cables, not the eyes of snakes, not the stones that murmur when incubated under a mother eagle, not the Arabian flying snake, nor the viper born beside the Red Sea, guardian of the precious pearl oyster, not the slough of the still-living Libyan horned stanke, not the ashes of the phoenix that settles itself upon an Eastern altar. After putting these common-or-garden and namable blights into her mixture, she added branches drenched in unspeakable spells, herbs on which her dread mouth had spat at the moment of their birth, and all the poisons she herself had contributed to the world. Then her voice, mightier than all the herbs in the bewitching of the gods of Lethe, poured out, first, mutterings that were discordant and not all of which sounded like the products of a human tongue. The voice contained the barking of dogs and the howling of wolves, the complaining cries of a scared owl and the night’s screech owl, the screeching and bellowing of wild animals, and the hissing of the snake. It expressed also the dashing of waves on rocks, the sound of the woods, and the thunder of a burst cloud. So many things did the single voice comprise. Then she pronounced more clearly a second set of utterances, in a Thessalian spell, and penetrated Tartarus with her tongue: “Furies; Crimes of the Styx; Punishments of the guilty; Khaos, you who long to confound unnumbered worlds; Hades, Ruler of the earth, for whom the death of gods, deferred across long ages, is agonizing; Styx; Elysium, the reward of no Thessalian woman; Persephone, you who detest heaven and your mother; Hecate, the lowest manifestation of my goddess, by whose grace the ghosts and I hold converse, with silent tongue; Doorkeeper of the broad house, you who throw human guts to the cruel dog; sister-Fates, destined to take up the threads of life again and continue spinning; ferryman of the flaming wave, reduced to a wornout old man by all the ghosts returning for me: hear my prayers. If I invoke you with a mouth sufficiently criminal and corrupt, if I never sing these incantations without first sating myself on human meat, if I had repeatedly opened up breasts, with the souls still in them, and rinsed them in warm brains, if any baby had been destined to live before it placed its head and entrails on your dishes, obey my prayer. I do not ask for a soul lying hidden in the cave of Tartarus long accustomed to the dark, but one that is only just now abandoning the light and coming down. He still hesitates at the edge of the abyss of colorless Orcus, and, even if he does give heed to these spells, he will still only join the other ghosts once. Let this Pompeian ghost, until recently our soldier, prophesy everything to Pompey’s son, if you are properly honored by civil war.” This she said, and lifted her head and foaming mouth. She saw the shade of the cast-out body standing beside her, in dread of the lifeless limbs and the hated bonds of its former prison. It was terrified to enter the opened breast and the guts and the organs smashed by the fatal wound. A pitiful man, from whom death’s final gift of immortality was unfairly snatched away. Erictho was taken aback that such delays had been permitted by the fates. Furious with death, she beat the motionless body with a live snake, and she barked through the open clifts she had driven into the earth by her incantation and ruptured the silence of the kingdom. “Tisiphone and Megaera, you who scorn my calling, do you not drive this hapless soul through the emptiness of Erebus with your cruel whips? Any moment now I shall call you up by your true names and make you stand as Stygian hounds in the light of the upper world. I shall pursue you through tombs, through burials, ever hanging on your heels, I shall drive you from barrows and keep you from all urns. You, Hecate, decaying and colorless in appearance as you are, are in the habit of showing yourself to the gods above only after first making up your face. I will show you to them and forbid you to alter your hell-face. I shall blurt out, Persephone of Henna, the meal that traps you beneath the vast weight of the earth, the agreement by which you love the somber king of the night and the corruption you experienced that induced your mother to refuse to call you back. Upon you, Hades, worst of the world’s rulers, I shall send Titan, the Sun, bursting your caverns open, and you will be blasted by the instantaneous light of day. Do you obey? Or will I have to invoke him — him, whose invocation always shakes the earth and sets it quaking, the one who looks upon the uncovered head of the Gorgon, the one who beats the trembling Fury with her own whips, the one who occupies a tartarus even you cannot look down to, the one to whom you are the gods above, the one who forswears himself by the waters of the Styx?” At once the congealed gore warmed up, soothed the black wounds and ran into the veins and the extremities of the limbs. As the blood struck them the organs beneath the chill breast quivered, and life, creeping anew into the innards that had forgotten it, mingled itself with the death. Then all the dead man’s limbs shook, and his sinews flexed. The corpse did not raise itself from the ground gradually, one limb at a time. Rather, it shot up from the earth and was upright in an instant. The eyes were laid bare, the mouth an open grimace. His appearance was of one not yet fully alive, but of a man still in the phase of dying. He was pallid and stiff, and in consternation at being brought back into the world. But his tightened mouth made no mutter. Voice and tongue were granted him only for replying." —Lucan, Pharsalia. (Translation from Magic, Witchcraft, and Ghosts in the Greek and Roman Worlds by Daniel Ogden.) Erichtho is the archetypal evil witch. She mixes all kinds of gruesome ingredients in the open chest of the corpse. She declares herself evil in her invocation to the chthonic gods, pledging that she has killed babies and committed cannibalism and other atrocities. She has absolutely no respect for the poor soul that she drags back, forcing him back into his mutilated body. Worst of all, she threatens the gods when they don’t give her what she wants fast enough — it’s fairly common in magic spells to threaten the gods and spirits you evoke to compel them to do what you want, but this is absolutely vicious and oddly personal. She threatens the Furies with enslavement, Hecate with being displayed before the other gods without makeup, Persephone with blackmail, Hades with having his domain exposed to daylight. She also threatens to send the Greco-Roman equivalent of flippin’ Cthulhu after them. I think it’s safe to assume that her earlier prayer of devotion to them was a bit insincere. I suppose, then, that whether necromancy is evil or not has less to do with what you’re doing and more to do with how you’re doing it. Necromancy is fine if you do a very normal sacrifice to the chthonic gods in order to speak with a ghost, like Odysseus, but not fine if you do all that weird and disturbing stuff that Erichtho does. (There were several necromantic oracles in which one could consult the dead in a more official capacity, such as the one in Thesprotia.) Assuming you don’t do anything Erichtho does, the only remaining ethical problem with necromancy is dragging back a poor soul that only wants to continue on to its peaceful afterlife. This is necessary, because necromancy works best on the recently dead. It’s easiest to call back a soul that hasn’t quite made it all the way to the afterlife yet, instead of one that has been there for so long that it’s gone mad. There’s also a final complication with necromancy that I haven’t touched on — reincarnation. The dead don’t always stay dead. The reason you can’t summon the ghost of Shakespeare or Cleopatra or Confucius is because they’ve been dead for so long, they’ve almost certainly reincarnated by now — perhaps multiple times. You can’t call them up because there’s no one to call. The Greek Magical Papyri don’t include many examples of divinatory necromancy, but a lot of them do call upon the souls of the dead, usually to torment whoever the caster wants (with either a curse or with erotic obsession). That wouldn’t fall under the ancient definition of necromancy, but it does fall under the modern definition of calling up the dead to do the caster’s bidding. Here’s an example: PGM IV. 1390–1495 Leave a little of the bread which you eat; break it up and form it into seven bite-sized pieces. And go to where heroes and gladiators and those who have died a violent death were slain. / Say the spell to the pieces of bread and throw them. And pick up some polluted dirt from the place where you perform the ritual and throw it inside the house of the woman whom you desire, go on home and go to sleep. The spell which is said upon the pieces of bread is this: “To Moirai, Destinies, / Malignities, To Famine, Jealousy, to those who died Untimely deaths and those dead violently, I’m sending food: Three-headed Goddess, Lady Of Night, who feed on filth, O Virgin, thou Key-holding Persephassa, Kore out Of Tartaros, grim-eyed, dreadful, child girt / With fiery serpents, he, [Your Name], has mixed With tears and bitter groans leftovers from His own food, so that you, O luckless heroes Who are confined there in the [name of graveyard] May bring success to him who is beset With torments. You who’ve left the light, O you Unfortunate ones, / bring success to him, [Your Name], who is distressed at heart because Of her, [Your Crush’s Name], ungodly and unholy. So bring her wracked with torment — and it haste! EIOUT ABAOTH PSAKERBA ARBATHIAO LALAOITH / IOSACHOTOU ALLALETHO You too as well, Lady, who feed on filth. SYNATRAKABI BAUBARABAS ENPHNOUN MORKA ERESCHIGAL NEBOUTOSOUALETH, and send the Erinyes ORGOGORGONIOTRIAN, Who rouses up with fire souls of the dead, / Unlucky heroes, luckless heroines, Who in this palce, who on this day, who in This hour, who in coffins of myrtlewood, Give heed to me and rouse / her, [Your Crush’s Name], on This night and from her eyes remove sweet sleep, And cause her wretched care and fearful pain, Cause her to follow after my footsteps, And / for my will give her a willingness Until she does what I command of her. O mistress Hekate PHORBA PHORBOBAR BARO PHORPHOR PHORBAI O lady of the Crossroads, O Black Bitch. When you have done / these things for three days and accomplish nothing, then use this forceful spell: just go to the same place and again perform the ritual of the bread pieces. Then upon the ashes of flax offer up dung / from a black cow and say this and again pick up the polluted dirt and throw it as you have learned. The words spoken over the offering are these: Chthonic Hermes and chthonic Hekate and chthonic Acheron and chthonic / flesh-eaters and chthonic god and chthonic Amphiaraos and chthonic attendants and chthonic spirits and chthonic sins and chthonic dreams / and chthonic oaths and chthonic Ariste and chthonic Tartaros and chthonic witchery, chthonic Charon and chthonic escorts and the dead and the daimons and souls of all men: / come today, Moirai and Destiny; accomplish the purpose with the help of the love spell of attraction, that you may attract me to her, [Your Crush’s Name] whose mother is [Your Crush’s Mother’s Name], to me [Your Name], whose mother is [Your Mother’s Name] (add the usual), because I am calling O primal Chaos, / Erebos, and you O awful water of the Styx, O streams O Lethe, Hades’ Acherousian pool, O Hekate and Pluto and Kore, And chthonic Hermes, Moirai, Punishments Both Acheron and Aiakos, / gatekeeper Of the eternal bars, now open quickly, O thou Key-holder, guardian, Anubis. Send up to me the phantoms of the dead Forthwith for service at this very hour. / So that they may go and attract to me, [Your Name], her, [Your Crush’s Name], whose mother is [Your Crush’s Mother’s Name] (add the usual). —From The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation by Hans Dieter Betz This is a love spell, but it is performed in a graveyard, where people who died violently are buried. It involves giving a food offering to the dead and throwing graveyard dirt in the house of the caster’s crush. The Ancient Greeks considered lust to be a kind of affliction, so the caster entreats the ghosts to afflict the target with lust and obsession until she comes to the caster. This real incantation bears a lot of similarities to Erichtho’s. It evokes the chthonic gods, particularly Hecate, who is most closely associated with necromancy. It requests that they send a soul who has recently died a violent death to fulfill the caster’s will. But it does not involve a corpse, it mentions no confessions of evil deeds, and it also does not threaten the gods. If the spell does not work, the second incantation is further entreating the gods, not threatening them with Cthulhu. This spell is not unethical for anything having to do with necromancy, it’s unethical because it requests that ghosts torment a poor woman until she has sex with the caster. Most love spells are unethical in that sort of way, so Do Not Try This At Home. One thing that interested me about the PGM is that it’s very similar to later magic — medieval and Renaissance magic follows many of the same formats, but in a Christian context. You’ll find similar necromantic spells from grimoires of that era. Here’s one from The Grande Grimoire, a sixteenth-century grimoire: The Magick Secret; or The Art of Speaking with the Dead For this operation it is necessary to attend midnight mass at Christmas and at midnight precisely to have a conversation with the inhabitants of the other world and at the moment that the Priest lifts the Host, bow down and with a frank and severe voice say “Esurgent mortuit et ac me veniut.” As soon as. you have pronounced these six words it is necessary to go to the cemetery and at the first tomb that meets your eye offer this prayer: “Infernal powers, you who bring the turbid in the universe, abandon your obscure dwelling and retire to the other side of the River Styx.” Then remain there for a moment of silence. “If you have your power, he or she that interests me, I supplicate you in the name of the King of Kings to make him appear before me at the hour and moment that I will indicate to you.” After this ceremony, which is indispensable to carry out, take a fistful of earth and spread it as one sows grain in a field, saying in a low voice: “He who is in dust awake from his tomb and leave his ashes and answer the questions that I pose him in the name of the Father of all men.” Then bend a knee to the ground, turning your eyes to the East and when you see that the doors of the Sun are going to open, arm yourself with the two bones of the dead man that you will put in a cross of Saint Andrew. Then throw them at the first temple or church that offers itself to your eyes. Having well-executed the aforesaid, set out in a western direction and when you have taken 5,900 steps, lay yourself down to sleep on the ground in an elongated position, holding the palms of your hand against your thighs, and your eyes to the sky towards the Moon and in this position, call he or she whom you wish to see, when you see the specter appear, solicit their presence with the following words: “Ego sum te peto, et videre queo.” After these words, your eyes will be satisfied to see the object that dearest to you and give you the most pleasurable delight. When you have obtained from the shadow which you have Invoked, that which you believe to be to your satisfaction, send it away in this manner: “Return to the kingdom of the elect, I am content with you and your presence.” Then picking yourself up, return to the same tomb where you made the first prayer above which you need to make a cross with the end of your blade which you will be holding in your left hand. The reader should not neglect any of the prescribed ceremonies otherwise he could incur some risk. As you can see, it’s very similar. It involves the scattering of graveyard dirt, and even an invocation to the chthonic gods! But, as in most grimoires, the magician is acting in the name of God. Other spells from Renaissance grimoires are more like the PGM spell, in that they don’t call the dead to answer questions, but instead utilize the dead for other purposes. Here’s a spell from the Grimorium Verum, an eighteenth-century grimoire: To Make oneself Invisible. "Collect seven black beans. Start the rite on a Wednesday, before sunrise. Then take the head of a dead man, and put one of the black beans in his mouth, two in his eyes and two in his ears. Then make upon his head the character of Morail. When you have done this, bury the head, with the face upwards, and for nine days, before sunrise, water it each morning with excellent brandy. On the eighth day you will find the spirit mentioned, who will say to you: "What wilt thou?" You will reply: "I am watering my plant." Then the spirit will say: "Give me the bottle, I desire to water it myself." In answer, refuse him this, even though he will ask you again. Then he will reach out with his hand, and will display to you that same figure which you have drawn upon the head. Now you can be sure that it is the right spirit, the spirit of the head. There is a danger that another one might try to trick you, which would have evil consequences—and in that case your operation would not succeed. Then you may give him the bottle, and he will water the head and leave. On the next day-- which is the ninth--when you return, you will find the beans that are germinating. Take them and put them in your mouth, and look at yourself in the mirror. If you can see nothing, it is well. Test the others in the same way, either in your own mouth, or in that of a child. Those which do not confer invisibility are to be reburied with the head." Yeah, that’s old-school magic for you. It’s weird as hell, not the least bit practical, and usually not ethical either. So what does ethical necromancy look like? Well, any use of corpses is inadvisable. If you were writing about a fictional necromancer who summons corpses to fight for them, then have them reanimate corpses with their own magic instead of dragging back their souls. These corpses would have to be the bodies of the long-dead whose souls have long since moved on; ones from mass graves or battlefields, not from the local graveyard where people still come to remember their loved ones. Summoning ghosts to fight for you would be unethical if it drags the spirit back from a happy place, but not if the ghost is stuck on earth. Ghosts of warriors or ghosts that really need to vent the negative emotions keeping them tied down might have no problem fighting for you, especially if you did something for them in return. A heroic example of this type of necromancy is Aragorn calling upon the Oathbreakers to fight for him, and allowing them to pass on to the afterlife as recompense. Another important aspect of ethical necromancy is, in my opinion, ghost therapy. A person who frequently summons ghosts to help with their magic can give back to them by helping them work through whatever issues were keeping them stuck on Earth. A lot of ghosts are sad people who cannot let go of their lives, so instead of letting themselves move on to a peaceful (if not happy!) afterlife, they continue to suffer on Earth. They can’t actually return to life, so they can’t solve whatever problem they have, and they just watch the rest of the world move on without them. They stagnate until they can resolve their psychological issues enough to move on. That’s where the necromancer comes in, acting like Cole in The Sixth Sense. For divinatory necromancy, or just having chats with dead loved ones, I think that time and place matters. Certain times of year, like Samhain for example, might allow the dead to freely cross between worlds. At those times, they can more easily stroll over to your side of reality to have a chat with you, without it being too much of an inconvenience for them. The soul of a particular loved one may also be more willing to keep in contact with you. I firmly believe that necromancy can be ethical. Part of necromancy’s bad reputation comes from the simple fact that death makes people squeamish. Magic involving death has always been part of magic’s history, and working closely with death does not make a magician evil, especially if they do so conscientiously. The key is simply to remember that the souls of the dead are people — they’re human beings who have personalities and desires and families, and their own path to follow that they are temporarily stepping away from for your benefit. Respect them. That same rule applies in the context of most magic, and life in general: Treat people like people.

Historical and Unethical Love Spells

Love spells are old, old magic. I won’t pretend otherwise. Love spells have been part of human culture for basically as long as human civilization has been around, because unrequited love is a nearly ubiquitous human experience, and it always stings. But love spells are awful, for many reasons. Take, for example, this love spell from the Greek Magical Papyri: *Love spell of attraction: Offering to the star of Aphrodite (i.e. the planet Venus): A white dove’s blood and aft, untreated myrrh and parched wormwood. Make this up together as pills and offer them to the star on pieces of vine / wood or on coals. And also have the brains of a vulture for the compulsion, so that you may make the offering. And also have as a protective charm a tooth from the upper right jawbone of a female ass or tawny sacrificial heifer, tied to your left arm with / Anubian thread. Compulsion element of the rite: “But, if as goddess you in slowness act, You will not see Adonis rise from Hades, Straightaway I’ll run and bind him with steel chains; / As guard, I’ll bind him another wheel Of Ixion, no longer will he come To light, and he’ll be chastised and subdued. Wherefore, O Lady, I act, I beg: Attract NN, whom NN bore, to come with rapid step To my door, me, NN, whom NN bore, / And to the bed of love, driven by frenzy, In anguish from the forceful goads — today, At once, quickly. For I adjure you, Kythere, NOUMILLON BIOMBILLON AKITOPHI ERESCHIGAL NEBOUTOSOUALETH PHROUREXIA THERMIDOCHE BAREO / NE.” —PGM IV. 2861–2915 The PGM, if you don’t know, is a set of ancient Graeco-Egyptian magical texts. (If you’re familiar with the Bornless Ritual, it’s originally from the PGM.) This is a real ancient love spell. It’s one of my favorite examples of a PGM spell because it’s got it all: weird ingredients, invocation and compulsion, barbarous names, the whole nine yards. And from the perspective of modern magical ethics, it’s full of red flags. Firstly, there’s the obvious. The brains of a vulture? “Double double toil and trouble” is not an unfounded stereotype, nor are the weird ingredients that witches throw in their cauldrons just spooky names for daisies and buttercups. Old spells have a lot of disturbing ingredients. There’s also this gem from PGM VII 191–92: *Eternal spell for binding a lover: Rub together some gall of a wild boar, some rock salt, some Attic honey and smear the head of your penis. How does that sound, gentlemen? Are you so desperate for love that you’ll smear your dicks with bile? Going back to the PGM IV, the first thing the conjurer does after offering all the weird ingredients to Aphrodite is threaten her. The conjurer says that if Aphrodite wants to see her lover Adonis return from Hades, she’d better obey, or else Adonis will be tortured for all eternity. At best, it’s pretty ballsy to threaten a god. Most would consider it outright hubris. (This is why magic has a bad reputation in some Hellenic pagan communities, despite the fact that not all spells do this or have to do this.) Then we get to the actual intention of the spell. The conjurer wants Aphrodite to afflict the target (“NN” means “insert name here”) with frenzied lust for the conjurer. The Ancient Greeks understood lust as a kind of affliction or madness, so it’s described as such in these spells. The target is to be tormented by lust to the point of anguish, as if she were being driven by a whip. Do I really need to explain why this is unethical? You’re threatening a god into tormenting your crush until they break and sleep with you. You may think that love spells might have changed in the millennia since that was written, but… not really. This one, from the Picatrix (a medieval Arabic manuscript) sounds a lot like the PGM one: "Take gazelle marrow and mutton dung, two drams of each, blend them together, and add camphor and the brain of a hare to them, two drams of each. Place it all in an iron vessel that you will place over the fire until all its contents have liquefied. Add crushed camphor to it. When everything is well mixed together, remove it from the fire. Then make an image from new wax, that is, wax that has never been used, while thinking of the one you desire. Make a hole in the mouth of this image down to the belly and pour in the above-mentioned liquid remedy while saying: Dahyeliz, Hanimidiz, Naffayz, Dabraylez. Next, place two drams of white sugar in its mouth. Take a silver needle, stick it in the chest of the image until it reemerges beneath the shoulder blade. And when you stick the needle in, say: Hedurez, Tameruz, Hetaytoz, Femurez. Once this has been done, wrap the image in a white cloth, and place over it another silk cloth that is white in color, which you shall attach with a silk thread. Tightly clasp all this to your own chest, and attach two hairs to it in which you shall make seven knots. And you will say these words over each of them: Hayranuz, Hedefiuz, Faytamurez, Arminez. Next, place the image inside a small earthen vase that you shall seal up with emery. Make a hole in the house where this woman lives or where she spends her time, bury the image inside it with its head up, and seal the hole back up. Then take incense and galbanum, two drams of each, and cast them into the fire. When the smoke is rising from it, you will say, “Beheymerez, Aumaliz, Menemeyduz, Caynaurez, turn the mind of this woman, N, and her desire towards this man! By the power of the above-named spirits and by the power and the force of the spirits Beheydraz, Metlurez, Auleyuz, Nanitaynuz!” Once this is done, return home. Know, indeed, that all the spirits will turn the thoughts and desires of this woman, for whom this operation has been carried out, towards this man for whom it has been performed. She shall not be able to rest, nor sleep, nor do anything whatsoever until she obeys the man for whom this has been done. And this woman shall be guided to the home of the buried image by the above-named forces." (Copied from The Book of Grimoires by Claude Lecouteux.) This spell would not be out-of-place in the PGM. It’s got the same weird ingredients, barbarous names, invocation of spirits, and the indented effect of the spell is the same. This one involves the creation of a poppet, and also throwing incense on a fire. Once again, the poor victim is compelled to submit herself to the man for whom the spell is cast. Fast-forward a couple centuries. This is a love spell from the early 20th century: "Buy three pennyworth of dragon’s blood. Don’t eat or drink between eleven and twelve at night; as the clock strikes twelve place the dragon’s blood on a piece of white paper in the grate and set it alight. While burning keep the name of your lover in mind and repeat the following: Dragon’s blood, dragon’s blood. Tis not your blood I wish to burn But my true love’s heart I wish to turn. May he never sleep, rest nor happy he, Until he comes or send to me." (Copied from The British Book of Spells and Charms by Graham King) This spell has a similar intention: to torment the victim until he’s compelled to come to the conjurer, except now the conjurer is a woman and the victim is a man. As in the Picatrix spell, the conjurer throws resin on a fire; dragon’s blood isn’t actual blood, it’s a flammable resin that smells nice. I think this spell is far more practical than the others because it doesn’t involve any disgusting ingredients. On the other hand, the spell listed directly after this one in King’s book asks you to put a frog on an anthill and let the ants eat it alive, then grind its skeleton with bat’s blood and add it to the food of the person you wish to attract. Eww. And so we come to the present day, and the most recent evolution of folk magic: WitchTok. (I’m completely serious. In a couple hundred years, the same scholars who study the PGM and grimoires and English folk spells will be looking back at WitchTok.) I found this WitchTok love spell in a YouTube reaction video, and it really stuck with me. Warning, this one (yes, the modern one) is the most NSFW one yet: "Okay guys, so today, as you can see, I’ve made a love potion. Now, I get kind of a lot of questions about love magic, like ‘how effective is it’ and ‘does it really work’? And the answer is yes, of course it works. How do you think I got my man, by showing off my titties on the internet? Well, I did, but this is how I made sure he’s gonna be bustin’ nuts on my face and no one else’s for the rest of his life. Now, all you’re gonna need for this is water, some glitter, a couple of heart-themed decorations like, I used some beads, and then about half a cup to a cup of his [semen]. Then add all those ingredients into a jar or a little jug like I used, and mix it up really well, you want all of these ingredients super integrated. Then, seal the jar, and you need to seal it really tight you do not want it to leak like your p*ssy when he chokes you. Then, you are all set, just give it a little shake whenever you need some love." There’s a lot to unpack here. In terms of its composition, this spell is actually very old-school. Believe it or not, semen is the least weird of all the weird ingredients that we’ve seen so far, because it has more visible logic behind it. There’s a concept called “sympathetic magic” that describes using a symbol to affect a target by means of a “sympathetic link,” i.e. whatever you do to the symbol, you do to the target. The Picatrix spell utilizes a poppet in this way — sticking a needle in the heart of the poppet is meant to afflict the target’s heart with infatuation. Using the man’s semen in this spell works in the same way. Having some piece of the target person will allow you to link your spell with the target. Clothing, hair, or fingernails are the weakest link, saliva is stronger, sexual fluids are even stronger, and blood is the strongest. For a sexual spell, using semen makes sense. That doesn’t make it any less gross, though (and how is one supposed to acquire a cup of it?). It’s the intention behind this spell that disturbs me. This time, it’s intended to keep rather than attract a lover, but it’s just as bad. Why would you feel the need to cast this type of spell, unless you didn’t trust your partner? If you’re insecure about them leaving, then that’s a “you” problem. If they really are untrustworthy, then you should break up with them. And that leads me to my next point — for the rest of his life? How long do you expect this relationship to last? If the spell is meant to make it last forever, that might not be a good thing. Maybe you’ll want to move on in a couple years, but your boyfriend will be magically compelled to only lust after you. Maybe it’ll last forever and maybe it won’t, but let that happen naturally instead of forcing it. A relationship is unlikely to last forever if there’s this much mistrust in it. At best, this spell is extremely unfair to him. At worst, it’s downright creepy. No amount of glitter and pink dye is going to make this any less horrifying. But what do I know? I’ve never been in love. Love is irrational, and being in love might very well make you want to control your partner’s emotions and behavior because you love them too much to let them go. Your emotions and your passion for them might seem more important than their free will. But if you don’t trust your partner, can’t communicate with them, and feel the need to control them, that makes you a toxic partner. And that leads me to my final point about love spells: Love, real love, cannot be faked or forced. Don’t you want someone who loves you for you, and not someone who has been magically brainwashed? Or physically afflicted with lust, instead of genuinely desiring you? In no way can a relationship created or sustained by love magic be healthy. I think it’s possible to do some love-related spells and have it not be unethical. If you cast a spell for a new relationship without naming anyone specific, that might be fine, because then you’re not directly interfering with someone else’s free will. Let the gods decide who your love will be, or use magic to arrange the circumstances in which you and your love will meet. As long as you leave your partner the ability to walk away, it’s fine. Better yet, use love magic to work on yourself. If you know you’re insecure about your partner leaving, do a spell to banish your insecurity. If you just went through a breakup, do a spell to help you move on instead of paying a scam artist to get your ex back. Maybe I’ll feel tempted to try and control my partner with magic once I’m in a relationship and subject to all the throes of passion. But I’m sure I’ll remember that, as with anything of this nature, consent is key.

Western Occultism

What kinds of magic are there? Including, but by no means limited to: Ceremonial magic: The practice of evoking and invoking deities and spirits to get to get them to do stuff for you, or to learn things from them. Theurgy is the practice of working with gods, angels, and other higher beings, while goetia is the practice of working with demons. Not that it’s really that black and white, because it isn’t. The tradition of ceremonial magic has ancient roots, but was codified during its explosion of popularity during the Renaissance. This is your Agrippa, your Levi, and your anonymous grimoires. ** Solomonic magic: The most well-known system of Renaissance ceremonial magic, based on the Keys of Solomon, two grimoires that teach the practitioner to summon angels and demons. It’s a very Abrahamic magic system. ** Kabbalah: A system of Jewish ceremonial magic that (in brief) allows the practitioner to reach the Divine through a path up through ten emanations of God, called sephiroth. It’s had a huge influence over Western occultism. ** Enochian magic: A system of “angel magic” created by John Dee and Edward Kelley in Elizabethan England. It’s very complicated and has a cool system of writing, but its biggest contribution to Western occultism has been the calling of the Watchtowers. Hermeticism and alchemy: An ancient system of occult philosophy, Hermeticism supposedly comes from a sage called Hermes Trismegistus who was apparently an incarnation of both Hermes and Thoth, the Greek and Egyptian gods of magic. Hermetic philosophy eventually formed the foundations of alchemy, which sought to create the perfect substance by distilling all of matter to its base components and then reforming it into a higher state. The chemical side of alchemy is actually a metaphor for the spiritual side, which is doing the same thing to the human soul — deconstructing it, and reforming it into a higher (i.e. divine) state of being. Hermeticism has also had a huge influence over the occult, of which the most famous is the organization called the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. Folk magic: While alchemy and ceremonial magic fall into the category pretentiously referred to as “high magic” (i.e. lofty, spiritually-inclined magic), folk magic is also called “low magic” (i.e. practical magic). These are your love spells, healing spells, luck spells, money spells, protection spells, curses, etc. There are traditions of folk magic in pretty much every culture going back to the dawn of time. They’re usually based in local lore, superstition, religion, and medicine. Herbalism (the half-magic-half-science art of using native plants to treat illnesses) falls under this category. Witchcraft: A catch-all term for modern secular or spiritual practices centering around European or Appalachian folk magic, with some ceremonial magic thrown in. Witchcraft can be difficult to define, and is sometimes used as a synonym for occultism in general, so that’s a tentative definition. The most popular system of witchcraft is Wicca, a religion that was created by Gerald Gardner in the 1950s. Voodoo/Vodou: A religion centered in Louisiana and Haiti that is a synthesis of indigenous African religions with Catholicism, as a result of slavery. It centers around spirits called loa (similar to deities, but they function more like a cross between saints and ancestor spirits). It has an accompanying practice of folk magic, called hoodoo. It is considered a closed culture, which means that only people from its related cultural background can practice it, with very few exceptions. Divination: A catch-all term for any kind of practice designed to communicate directly with the divine or the natural world, essentially, acquiring information by magical means. Divination exists in all cultures and all religions, and all occultists use some form of it. Forms of divination include but are not limited to: cartomancy (tarot or oracle cards), scrying (gazing into a mirror, crystal ball, or other blank object), cleromancy (casting lots, dice, bones, or rune stones), chiromancy (palmistry), oneiromancy (dream interpretation), augury (interpreting natural signs), arithmancy (divination using numbers, part of the larger occult field of numerology), dowsing (divination using a pendulum or dowsing rod), etc. Astrology: A particularly ancient and influential system of divination that involves interpreting the position of heavenly bodies in the sky. Astrology is extremely complicated and was once considered quite prestigious. Its influence over occultism is profound, and a lot of occultists time all of their rituals and spells according to astrological events to get the most favorable circumstances possible. The theory behind this can be summed up by the occult maxim “as above, so below” — the workings of the universe reflect life on earth, and vice-versa. Shamanism: Loosely generalized as “tribal magic.” The word “shaman” properly refers to religious leaders in Siberian tribe, but the term has broadened to refer to the practices of Native American medicine people, African tribal healers, and indigenous Australian tribal healers. Such people use techniques like ecstatic trance and astral projection to communicate with spirits and shapeshift. Chaos magic: A relatively new approach to occult practice that is based in experimentation and eclecticism, with an emphasis on personal preference and rejection of dogma. Chatoes consider belief to be a tool, and ideally are able to change their religious beliefs and affiliations at will. The only real tenant of chaos magic is that reality is what you make of it, that your perceptions affect and influence reality itself. The only actual practice associated with chaos magic specifically is sigil magic, which is very “quick and dirty,” cut-the-crap magic (if you can do it right). And most of that is Western occultism. I know only bits and pieces of Eastern occultism (mostly Indian, through having studied yoga) but that’s a sphere unto itself. And although I listed divination as its own thing, I didn’t even bother to list all of the other practices that are present in many (if not all) of these paths, such as sympathetic magic, talismans, energy work, meditation, astral projection, etc. You could spend your whole life studying magic of various kinds.

A Primer on Theurgy

The purpose of working with a deity is to add the deity’s energy and influence to your workings, or to have them aid in your own personal spiritual development. Exactly what the deity ends up helping you with is going to depend a lot on which deity it is, and what you want to get out of your relationship with them. A relationship with a deity is therefore very personal. You can choose the deities that you work with, but if you ask a deity to work with you, it may very well say no. Or, it may teach you one thing and then move on. It’s best to treat deities like people, and approach them like you would human teachers or colleagues. It’s also possible that a deity might choose you. So, how do you know if one has chosen you? Here are some indications that the deity is reaching out to you: You feel inexplicably drawn to this deity in particular: If you feel compelled to study a particular deity for no apparent logical reason, that can mean that the deity is trying to nudge you towards it. My patron deity turned out to be Dionysus, which I would never have guessed; I became inexplicably obsessed with him, and the more research I did, the more and more he resonated for me. If for some reason you feel like you need to research a deity, especially if that deity seemed to come out of nowhere, I recommend you heed the call. “Signs”: What most people mean when they speak of getting “signs” of a deity’s interest is encountering things related to it as you go about your daily life. Usually this means running into the deity’s iconography — continuing to use Dionysus as an example, this would mean seeing a lot of grapevines, leopard print, masks, or bull’s horns. There’s more than just iconography, though. Maybe you hear music with lyrics that remind you of the deity, or overhear a conversation that reminds you of it. Smells, tastes, and sensations related to the deity might crop up as well. Now, to be clear, seeing a raven and interpreting it as a symbol of the Morrigan does not change the fact that the bird is just a bird. What makes it a sign is that you noticed it. And, because this one is the easiest to be influenced by confirmation bias, you have to receive different kinds of “signs” with enough frequency, so that you know it wasn’t just a one-off or wishful thinking. You have to be able to distinguish between your confirmation bias and genuine intuition. Signs are also extremely obvious; if you find yourself asking if something is a sign, it probably isn't. Synchronicities: The most obvious signs are synchronicities — signs that occur in succession or in accordance with each other to draw attention to themselves. Seeing a raven is one thing; reading a book about the Morrigan in a park and looking up to find a raven staring directly at you is another. One time I was cleaning up one of my card decks shortly after speaking with Dionysus, thinking to myself, “lol wouldn’t it be funny if I drew the Satyr card?” I promptly drew it straight from the deck. Kind of hard to ignore or second-guess that! Pay close attention to any creepy coincidences. The deity approaches you directly: If the deity actually shows up in a dream or a meditation, that’s a pretty blatant sign that it wants to work with you, or at least wants your attention. If this doesn’t happen to you, don’t sweat it. Not everyone has dreaming ability. I certainly don’t! On one hand, if you’re looking for signs, it’s really easy to interpret anything as a sign no matter how mundane, because of confirmation bias. If you’re looking for signs, you’re inevitably going to find them. On the other hand, it’s possible to be receiving really obvious signals and keep second-guessing yourself: Why would the gods bother to talk to me? What makes me so special? They can’t actually be giving me signs, right? I frequently feel insecure about my own “worthiness.” I have felt undeserving of divine attention, but hey, it’s rude to ignore them! The only way to know for sure that you have caught a god's attention is to talk to it during a meditation or ritual. You can talk to any god you want regardless of whether it has given you “signs” or not. Most of them are open to listening if you reach out to them. The first thing to do is to research extensively. Buy books on the god. Learn as much as you can about its anthropological origins and the way it was historically worshipped and interpreted. What did it represent then? What does it represent now? See if anything resonates for you. Here are some things you should research about the deities you plan to work with: Names and Epithets: What are all the different names this god was known by? (For example, Persephone is also called Proserpine, Kore, and Persephassa.) What are its epithets? Epithets are titles or bynames that describe different capacities in which a god is worshipped, putting the worship of the god into a particular context. (For example, Zeus Ombrios is the version of Zeus that brings the rain to support agriculture, as opposed to, say, Zeus Teleios, the version of Zeus that rules over marriage.) Myths: It’s almost certain that there will be more versions of the gods’ stories than the basic version you learned when you were a kid. Even if you think you know the the gods’ myths really well, you probably don’t. In some cases, the myths are all that survive, which means you’ll have to really pay attention to them in order to learn about what your gods are associated with. Domains: You may think you know the gods’ domains, but chances are, the domains are more nuanced and dynamic than you think they are. List everything associated with the god in every context, and see what you get. Hymns: Are there any surviving hymns to the gods that you can incorporate in your rituals? Sacred Days and Festivals: Which days, seasons, lunar phases, etc. is the god associated with? When should you be worshipping it? Correspondences: This is the fun stuff related to witchcraft. What herbs, stones, colors, animals, symbols, elements, etc. is the god associated with? How can you use them in your rituals and spells? Offerings: What would your deity have traditionally been offered? Syncretism: Which other gods was this deity syncretized with? By whom? How is the syncretized deity different from the “vanilla” deity? (Make sure it’s actual historical syncretism, and not the modern version of “interpretatio graeca” that claims that Zeus and Odin are basically the same. They’re not.) Of course, this information is not always available, because so much has been lost to time. There isn’t much in the way of surviving pagan hymns to Celtic gods, for example, and information on epithets might be pretty limited. But do the best you can, and see how other pagans have adapted the material that we do have to fill in the gaps. Worshipping a god is doing devotional activities, praying, reciting hymns, giving offerings, and so forth. Working with a god is getting its help with your magic or problems in your life. You don’t have to have been “called” or receive signs from a god to work with one. Any god is going to appreciate your worship, the same way that businesses want your money. Not all gods might be interested in working with you, though. There’s a pretty heavy emphasis placed on “patron deities” in modern paganism. A patron deity is one that takes a direct and personal interest in your spiritual development. I have a patron deity, and I feel very lucky to have one! But patron deities are not the be-all-end-all of theurgy, and should not be treated that way. You can have relationships with the gods, whether you have a specific patron or not. Once you have a relationship with a deity, what do you do with it, in a practical sense? Devotional rituals: A lot of neopagans like to do daily devotional rituals to their deities. I don’t, but if you feel like you want to, it’s an excellent opportunity to become familiar with them. What exactly do you think worship should look like? When you’re just starting out, it may be a good idea to do devotionals in order to win the favor of the deity that you want to work with, and direct most of your other workings towards them. Spellwork: You don’t have to call on a deity for spellwork at all, if you don’t want to, but a deity can lend his/her/its energy to whatever you attempt and carry out the parts that you can’t. Just be wary of treating deities as pools of free energy. It’s disrespectful to do that. When you ask a deity to lend its energy to you, be respectful. Meditation: It’s important to find some sort of meditation technique that works for you, so you can communicate with the deity directly. My favorite means of meditation is pacing, a form of oscillation — very appropriate for whom I work with (see below). Divination: As another means of direct communication, find a method of divination that you like or that your deity likes. I tend to use automatic writing. Pendulums are popular, but they’re not that useful in the long run because they only answer yes/no questions. Ideally, you should be able to have a full back-and-forth conversation with it. Invocation: Another step up from the above, invocation is inviting the deity in your body so that it can share or take over your consciousness. I wouldn’t attempt full possession without other people there for your own safety, but you could still invoke the deity if you’re careful. Just talking: You can learn a lot just by talking to it. If you don’t know how it prefers to be worshipped, ask it. If you don’t know what you can learn from it, ask it. If you have spiritual or even practical questions, ask it. They don’t always give useful answers, but it’s still a good idea to talk to them. You should attempt to get to know them the way you would a person. I would start by finding a deity that you feel particularly drawn to, and then getting to know it. Ask it what you can learn from it, and what the purpose of working with it would be. If you’re lucky, a deity might approach you as your patron, and take a direct personal interest in your spiritual growth. My patron deity turned out to be Dionysus, and he is helping me to feel more joy in my life.

Chaos Magic

Chaos magic is the occult world’s equivalent of modern dance. It’s a big “screw you” to all of the formally accepted norms of Western occultism, the same way modern dance is a big “screw you” to ballet. Of course, individual modern choreographers have their own techniques, but in general, modern deliberately breaks the rules of ballet — no shoes, lack of composure, curved back, flexed feet, turns that are deliberately off-balance, rolling around on the floor, more thematically abstract, wider range of musical styles scoring it, eclectic incorporation of other dance styles, etc. Modern noticeably builds off of ballet, but it’s also a rejection of the conventions of ballet. There’s so much variation within modern dance that one cannot really summarize its technique, only that of specific choreographers. Likewise, Chaos Magic builds off of ceremonial magic and other earlier, more rigid systems, but is also a rejection of their conventions. Chaos magic doesn’t bother with initiations or specific and detailed ceremonial procedures. A crude summary of the chaote’s approach to magic is “if it works, do it, if not, fuck it.” This means that chaos magic is extremely experimental and eclectic. Most chaotes don’t have the patience for complicated ritual procedures, but will still use them if they find that they work. Practicality and effectiveness are what matter, regardless of the particular tradition a technique comes from. That also means that if something commonly or traditionally used doesn’t work for you, you’re under no obligation to do it that way. As a result, chaos magic is extremely personalized. Particular to chaos magic is the rejection of dogma. Chaotes use belief as a tool, and ideally are able to change their entire belief systems at will. I’ve learned from Quora that this is apparently alien to most people; I didn’t think I was able to change my beliefs at will, because I’m very particular about the things I believe, but when people ask me why I believe in gods and I say “because I want to,” I get baffled reactions. Apparently, the average person either believes in a god or doesn’t, and can’t choose whether to believe or not. This ability to choose is something chaotes cultivate. The only actual technique specifically associated with chaos magic is sigil magic, which is loosely based on the use of seals to represent spirits in the grimoiric tradition, but works differently. Sigils are symbols meant to represent the spellcaster’s intention on a subconscious level, so that conscious faculties (like worry or self-doubt) won’t interfere with it. They effectively bypass all of the pomp and circumstance of ritual, and the better you get at them, the less ritualistic elements you need. This is why they’re popular with chaotes — no ritual, no correspondences, just scrawl a symbol and you’re done. A sigil doesn’t even need to be a glyph, it can be anything created specifically to represent the intention. Sigils become easy, quick-and-dirty magic, but they also require you to get yourself in the right kind of psychological state on a whim, which is incredibly difficult without ritual. Sigils are by no means specific to chaos magic, but the modern method of creating and using them was invented by a chaote, so it is explicitly associated with chaos magic in a way other magical practices are not. That doesn’t mean you have to use sigils to be a chaote. That’s like saying you have to use that nigh-universal wide-second plie with the chest and head up and the arms opened and upturned to be a modern dancer. My go-to book recommendation is Hands-On Chaos Magic by Andrieh Vitimus, because it's a primer on all the most important magical techniques whilst remaining strictly practical and non-denominational.

Trance Techniques

What the hell is trance? Why is it important? There’s an entire chapter on this in Hands-On Chaos Magic by Andrieh Vitimus, called “Why is trance needed in magic?” Here’s an excerpt: "The fact is, the psychic censor (or the host of other names it is called) completely limits our conception of what is possible. When you believe something is not possible, it is not. […] If we cannot automatically shift our beliefs and patterns, how can we make more adaptive changes? Both in the internal world and the external world, we are told “no change.” Essentially, our conditioning and the near-conscious parts of the mind are working against us when we try to do magic." What this means is that, for magic to work, you have to allow your subconscious mind to take over for a bit. In order to do that, you have to switch your conscious mind off, or at least bring it to a different state of awareness. This is becuase magic is performed primarily on the subconscious level. Intentions are strongest when supported by the subconscious mind. The subconscious mind also supports your Willing Suspension of Disbelief — in order for your magic to work, you have to actually believe that it will work, without your conscious mind shutting it down at every turn. I do this to myself all the time, and not just with magic-related stuff. I relentlessly shut myself down with everything related to my writing. I don’t let my “muse” generate raw ideas. “No, that’s too cliche. No, that wouldn’t work. How do I actually write that, though? You’re going to have to meticulously plan out that plotline, because as it stands, it’s completely nonsensical. There’s nowhere to put this dialogue. You’re going to have to find something to actually do with that cool magical item, or else it’s just a useless MacGuffin and you have a useless predictable plot. The words sound wrong. The words are wrong.“ I censor my random generation of ideas to the point where I don’t actually get any work done. You have to be able to turn that internal censor off, or you won’t actually get any work done. I still really struggle with it. So, how do you do that? The goal is to put yourself somewhere between light daydreaming and sleep. There are two main types of trance. The first is inhibitory trance, which involves limiting your body and mind in some particular way, intended to quiet it down until nothing exists but the intention or idea being focused on. The other type is excitatory trance, which is an attempt to overstimulate the mind and body until the conscience and the body just shut off. There are actually a lot of different ways of achieving trance, which I didn’t know at first. Here’s a few: Sitting or lying still: This is a traditional method of achieving trance, with the ideal being to put the mind somewhere between waking and sleeping. I cannot do this, but it seems to work for a lot of people, especially when accompanied with lulling music, atmosphere, or visualizations. Tai-chi, yoga, or other slow movement: For some people, doing a series of slow movements or holding positions can help them to let their minds wander. Chanting: Chanting a mantra while doing one of the above can help the mind settle into a steady focus on one, singular thing — a desire, a memory, an emotion, a deity or spirit, a sensation, etc. An excitatory form of chanting can be shouting, screaming incoherently, or glossolalia. Scrying: Scrying is a form of divination that involves staring into a blank object, traditionally a crystal ball or a black scrying mirror. One could technically scry any blank surface, though, even just the darkness of a room. You gaze into it until your mind slowly switches off and you enter a dreamlike state. Ecstatic dance or other fast movement: Dancing ecstatically can put the mind in a state similar to a high. It also tires out the body, so if you dance or whirl and then quickly fall to the ground, you’ll be too dizzy and euphoric for your conscious mind to be in control. Oscillation: A repetitive swinging or spinning motion can help to both stimulate the body and lull the mind. I usually meditate by pacing back and forth, with the speed of my step reflecting the speed of my thoughts, ranging anywhere from slow walking to fast running and leaping. My conscious mind doesn’t really shut off, but my mind certainly wanders. Masturbation: This is definitely one of the easier methods of attaining trance, and its other main benefit is that it whisks your mind off to some really weird and disturbing places, making it ideal for Shadow work. Substance-induced trance: Shamans have been using different natural drugs as gateways to powerful trance states for thousands of years. The Dionysian Mysteries use wine as a means of achieving trance, alongside ecstatic dancing. Substance-induced trance is certainly easy, but it’s obviously dangerous, hard to control, and not always healthy (to put it mildly). Don’t rely on drugs as a means of achieving trance, and if you’re going to use them, be as careful and well-informed as possible. How do you know when you’ve attained trance? I actually don’t know. I think that depends entirely on the person. It took me ages to realize that I’m actually really good at meditation, because inhibitive forms of achieving trance really don’t work for me. I encourage you to find a method of trance that works well for you, personally. Even if it feels like you’re not doing it “right.” What matters is that you get results. Don’t feel like you need to spend thirty minutes quieting down your mind unless it actually helps you.

Appearances

"Black Magic"

One of my least favorite tropes in fiction is the trope of temptation and corruption — the Dark Side is inherently evil, and any amount of interaction with it will leave a permanent and lasting stain on your soul. In The Lord of the Rings, the power of the One Ring cannot be used for good. Even touching it poisons the mind, and it exploits the natural desire for its power to turn good people towards the cause of evil. Gandalf and Galadriel know that they should avoid the temptation entirely, because it is impossible to use the Ring to do good. In Star Wars, the Dark Side of the Force is unambiguously evil, and anyone who interacts with it risks being corrupted by it. It’s also a powerful temptation. Most Star Wars protagonists demonstrate their strength of character by resisting it. So many stories of this type are about resisting the temptation of the darkness, because as per the question, when you use dark magic, something “happens” — you lose your sanity or humanity, you get Dragged Off to Hell, you become a slave of the Dark Side, etc. etc. Just engaging with the dark has the potential to turn you to evil. I really, really don’t like this idea. There’s not much in the way of balance if there’s all-light, no darkness. I’m not a fan of the conflation of darkness with evil, whether that’s literal darkness or figurative darkness. I also think that the only way something becomes a “temptation” is because it’s evil, or thought to be evil. One of my favorite quotes is from The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde: “The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it. Resist it, and your soul grows sick with longing for the things it has forbidden to itself, with desire for what its monstrous laws have made monstrous and unlawful.” What I take this to mean is that temptation must, necessarily, be desire for something considered sinful or taboo. The One Ring is dangerous not just because it’s evil, but because it’s such a powerful temptation. Without that connotation of evil attached to the temptation, it’s not a temptation, just a desire. The more you try to resist temptation, the more powerful it becomes. The only way to get rid of it is to simply not be tempted by it, to either not view the desire as evil or not have the desire in the first place. To do that, you have to find outlets for your vices that make use of them in ways that are constructive. (Temptations are only fun if you get to give into them. Otherwise, what’s the point of having them at all? Angst?) I think that the only reason why dark magic is a temptation is becuase it’s thought to be evil. If magic is just magic, with some being “darker” and some “lighter” but all morally neutral, then using said magic isn’t going to erode your moral sense. My favorite stories are those in which characters are able to safely engage with the darkness, whatever that may be, and use it to become stronger. Bad Powers, Good People is one of my favorite tropes. I love characters like Alucard and Soma from Castlevania or Raven from Teen Titans or The Knight from Hollow Knight, who have dark or stereotypically evil-coded powers, but use them for heroic reasons. So that brings me to occultism. Firstly, in real-life magical practices, there’s no “Dark Side of the Force.” There’s no such thing as inherently evil magic. That’s as absurd as drawing a distinction between “dark fire” which destroys buildings and forests, and “light fire” that sits calmly in a stove, forge, or fireplace. Fire is just fire, and magic is just magic. The difference is only in how its used. I also firmly believe that engaging with the darker side of your personality isn’t just a good thing, but is actually necessary for mental health. You can’t make your negative qualities go away, but you can gain self-awareness that will allow you to make good use of them. After all, there’s really no such thing as “character flaws,” just traits that are sometimes good and sometimes bad depending on the context. Repressing them does you no favors, and eventually backfires. Knowledge of your own weaknesses, limits, and lusts will allow you to have more control over your actions, and to shrug nonchalantly when the villain proclaims that you and they are not so different. Secondly, though “the occult” may have something of a sinister reputation, that is only because it is poorly understood by people who haven’t studied it, and because the word is often applied to supposed shadowy cults in conspiracy theories. Occultism is not corrupting. Studying or practicing it won’t have a negative effect on you if you do it safely, the same way fire won’t burn you if you know how to safely handle it. Likewise, the darker and edgier practices within occultism do not make the practitioners evil people. Demonolators can be perfectly normal, decent people. On the other side of the same coin, those who preach “love-and-light” are sometimes self-righteous jerks. And thirdly, I think it’s necessary for any occultist to be willing to “descend into the Underworld” and confront the darker side of their own nature, and that of the spiritual world. So many stories involve heroes descending into the darkness because doing so is a necessary part of spiritual progress. Darkness is just a part of nature, not inherently good or evil. Many gods and goddesses are dark, and those that aren’t still have qualities and powers that can be terrifying. You do yourself no favors spiritually by being afraid of the dark. I think that by becoming comfortable with our own Shadows and gaining control over them, we can use their powers for good, so to speak. That requires courage and self-awareness. There’s gold in the Shadow, and there’s enlightenment hidden in the dark. “…Ged had neither lost nor won but, naming the shadow of his death with his own name, had made himself whole: a man: who, knowing his whole true self, cannot be used or possessed by any power other than himself, and whose life therefore is lived for life’s sake and never in the service of ruin, or pain, or hatred, or the dark.” —Ursula K. Le Guin, A Wizard of Earthsea

A "Black Magic" Primer for Edgy Witches

“Black magic” is a misleading term, and about how magic is a tool that has no inherent morality any more than fire or a knife does. But “black magic” does have some specific practices that are associated with it, and the role that baneful magic plays in various cultures is something worth examining anyway. So you know what? Why not? I’ll assume that by “black magic” you mean that you’re interested in edgier or more LHP-aligned practices, so here’s a first draft of Nyx’s Basic Grimoire of Spooky Magic and Other LHP-Related Stuff. There’s broadly two kinds of magic: “high magic” and “low magic.” These designations overlap, a lot, and the division between them has more to do with classism than anything else. But they’re generally useful in separating work with spirits and deities from work with objects and people. When people think of “black magic,” they usually think of two things, one in each of those categories. In the “high magic” category, they think of summoning demons. In the “low magic” category, they think of hexes, curses, and (often) poppets. Demonology This is the type of magic that a mysterious robed figure performs in a dark, candlelit room with a magic circle (not a pentagram) on the floor. There’s broadly two different approaches to summoning a demon. The first is traditional or Solomonic conjuration, which evokes a demon based on complicated procedures in The Lesser Key of Solomon and other grimoires. This approach assumes that demons are dangerous creatures that must be bound and compelled by the magician. Traditional Solomonic conjurations are very Christian, and bind the spirits in the name of God. The second is demonolatry, which involves practitioners actually worshipping the demons as gods, recognizing them as more neutral entities that deserve respect and devotion as much as deities do. Demonolators will try to establish working relationships with demons, similar to those that neopagans have with gods. Demonolators are often theistic Satanists, but don’t necessarily have to be. They still tend to use a lot of the same source material, but alter it significantly. If you’re interested, The Lesser Key of Solomon is required reading. If you’re interested in high magic but you’d rather not deal with anything Abrahamic, I recommend working with dark deities like Hecate, Set, the Morrigan, or Nergal. Most pagan religions have deities of death and darkness somewhere in there, and the majority of these entities are not evil or dangerous. That said, they can still be intense, unpredictable, and testy. They’ll put you through the wringer, even if it’s for your own good. Do your research and make sure you know what you’re getting yourself into. It should go without saying, but don’t do anything stupid. Don’t sell your soul (not that you really can, anyway). Don’t promise anything you can’t give. Don’t sign a contract without reading the fine print. Don’t get so carried away by hubris that you’re patting yourself on the back for being able to “control” these immensely powerful beings. (I’ve fallen into this trap, and thank the gods, all it did was spoil a few potential relationships. I got very lucky.) And for gods’ sake, don’t summon anything you can’t banish. Do not call up what you cannot put down. Maybe read Doctor Faustus and “The Case of Charles Dexter Ward” for some cautionary tales. Sympathetic Magic On the “low magic” side, the most important concept to understand is the “law of sympathy” — in a ritual, you will most likely be acting upon a symbol of your actual target, and whatever you do to the symbol, you will do to the target. There’s lots of different ways this can be applied. For example, carrying beans in your purse like coins will draw money to you, because you’re treating the beans like coins. Like attracts like, so the symbolic coins “turn into” real coins. The most famous use of sympathetic magic is the concept of a poppet, which is often (disrespectfully) called a “voodoo doll.” The doll (which is usually made of cloth, clay, or wax) represents a person, and whatever you do to the doll, you do to the person. This technique can be utilized for benefic reasons, such as healing or protection, but it can also be utilized for malefic reasons. If you burn or bury the doll, you’ll negatively affect the person. Sticking pins in it can have positive or negative effects depending on your intention (think acupuncture). Acting upon a photograph of a person or writing their name on a piece of paper and burning it would also work. If you need to do baneful magic, I recommend banishing or binding over cursing. Banishing removes a person’s influence from your life if they’ve treated you badly, and binding prevents them from harming themselves or others. If you must curse, do it for just reasons and not out of pure spite. Let the gods decide the person’s fate. Sigils Sigils are relevant to both of the above types of magic, but in different ways, so they’re worth talking about. In ceremonial magic, a sigil or seal is a symbol that represents the name and essence of a spirit. Wearing them will allow you to summon and command the spirit. Grimoires will almost always include them. Sigils can also be spells in the form of an abstract symbol, usually a glyph, but sometimes a phrase or movement or object. It’s very easy to cast a sigil — you just need to draw it on something (or chant the phrase, perform the movement, etc.) and then do a little ritual procedure to activate it, and that’s it. Then you forget about it and let it do its thing! Sigils are convenient because they bypass all the ritualistic BS and cut right to the chase, but that also makes them powerful and more dependent on your psychology. You have to have a great amount of control over your own mindset and know exactly what you want (not what you think you want). Sigil magic can quickly go wrong if you aren’t really sure of yourself. The most famous method for creating sigils was developed by Austin Osman Spare, which is probably why sigil magic is the only actual practice associated with Chaos Magic. Spare’s method is to take a statement of intent, remove all repeated letters, and create an abstract symbol out of the remaining letters. I personally prefer to intuit symbols and just draw whatever pops into my head. You can make sigils out of any sort of design, image, or idea. There’s more I could discuss that tends to fall into the “black magic” category. I've discussed necromancy already in another post, and I think the only other major thing I’m missing is using poisonous plants and psychoactive substances in magic. But I don’t have much experience with that, so I’m not really the right person to discuss it. Actually wait, the other big thing I’m missing is sex magic, but that’s also something I have very limited experience with. For more details on all of the above, I direct you to the resources below: Everything by Konstantinos. (I recommend Nocturnal Witchcraft for the more basic stuff and Nocturnicon for the advanced stuff.) Shadow Magick Compendium by Raven Digitalis Of Blood and Bones by Kate Freuler The Black Arts by Richard Cavendish. (This is all theoretical, not practical.) Hands-On Chaos Magic by Andrieh Vitimus. This is always my go-to recommendation for everything practical, no matter what the field.

The Witch's Familiar

A familiar is technically a spirit, not an animal. Familiars traditionally took the shape of animals (which led to many hapless animals getting slaughtered as alleged familiars during the witch hunts), but familiars themselves are spirits. In folklore, they are minor demons or imps, granted to the witch by the Devil himself to act as the witch’s minions. The witch feeds the familiars with drops of her own blood. Sometimes, the “witch’s mark” was understood to be a sort of extra nipple on which the familiar could suckle blood (hence Shadwell’s eternal question, “How many nipples have ye got?”). The witch can send the familiar out into the world to do her evil bidding. According to anthropologist Ronald Hutton, familiars were specifically a feature of British witchlore, and then eventually American witchlore by way of English settlers. The origins of familiars are unclear. He says that there is no real scholarly consensus on the origins of familiars, but that there are a few prevailing ideas: "One is that the animal familiar developed from the learned tradition of ceremonial magic, and its fondness, attested since its first appearance in Ancient Egypt, for summoning spirits to serve the magician. Another is that it grew out of the fairy tradition, especially from the figure of the household helper spirit, and from claims often made by service magicians [i.e. cunning folk] to have been taught their skills by the fairy folk. […] Another was that the animal familiar should be related to a whole broad range of folkloric phenomena, from Wilby’s shamanistic helper spirits to the animal mascots of pagan deities and followers of saints. All of these phenomena needed instead to be put under the general, and very widespread, folk motif of the “grateful animal,” of which the familiar was one aspect. It was also argued, in riposte to the derivation from fairy lore, that the animal familiar belonged instead firmly in a demonic framework, being derived from the satanic imps of the Middle Ages." —Ronald Hutton, The Witch Hutton describes several examples in European folklore in which the Devil appears to witches in the form of various black animals (a cat, a bull, a bear, a goat, a fly, etc.), and demons in animal form that transport witches to the Sabbath. So apparently, the demonic attendant was just a natural next step from these existing motifs, attaching demonological lore to pets. Regardless of where they came from, familiars very quickly became ubiquitous in British witchlore. Familiars appear in Renaissance-era British plays about witches. In Macbeth, the three witches have familiars named Grimalkin (a cat), Paddock (a toad), and Harpier (an owl). In The Witch of Edmonton, the witch’s familiar, a dog called Tom, is quite literally the Devil. There’s a disturbing implication of a sexual relationship between “Tom” and the witch: MOTHER SAWYER I am dried up With cursing and with madness, and have yet No blood to moisten these sweet lips of thine. Stand on thy hind-legs up—kiss me, my Tommy, And rub away some wrinkles on my brow By making my old ribs to shrug for joy Of thy fine tricks. What hast thou done? let’s tickle. Hast thou struck the horse lame as I bid thee? DOG Yes; And nipped the sucking child. MOTHER SAWYER Ho, ho, my dainty, My little pearl! no lady loves her hound, Monkey, or paroquet, as I do thee. This alludes to the motif I just described, of the familiar suckling blood from the witch. But the witch demands that Tom kiss her, and “let’s tickle” may very well be double entendre. I remember being put off when I saw this section for the first time, but since the Devil is already established as having sexual relationships with witches in folklore, this isn’t too surprising. For a more modern example, that is still very much period-accurate, in The VVitch, the Devil appears as a goat called Black Phillip. Of course, he’s not really a goat: "Wouldst thou like to live deliciously?" Lucky for us, the idea of a “familiar” doesn’t really need to be reclaimed from this Satanic origin. In pop culture, familiars are now the animal companions of magical people, not devilish spirits that disguise themselves as animals. I remember a book series called The Familiars that I loved as a kid, about three familiars (a cat, a blue jay, and a tree frog) that have to save the world. A different understanding of the concept appears in His Dark Materials, in which each person has a “daemon,” their soul, which manifests externally in the form of an animal. The most unique take I’ve seen so far has got to be Palismans from The Owl House, which are staff toppers carved from wood that can come to life, being both tools and companions. For modern witches, familiars are somewhere in between. A lot of witches will describe their pets as their familiars, especially if their pets have magical skills and/or the witch has a spiritual connection to their pets. (I have a very witchy-looking black cat, but he has no unique magical skills, so I don’t call him a familiar.) Other witches will use the word “familiar” to describe a companion spirit, usually a helpful lesser entity (i.e. not a god, angel, or archdemon) that they have a close personal relationship with: "The primary function of a familiar spirit is that of a magical assistant to the Witch. The word familiar itself derives from the Latin familiaris, which can variously refer to a servant or an intimate acquaintance. At times the relationship between a Witch and their familiar will manifest in the capacity of master and servant, wherein the familiar will unwaveringly perform a Witch’s every request. But more often than not, the bond between Witch and familiar is closer to friendship or at least an equal partnership. There is a symbiotic nature at the heart of the relationship, in that the Witch will exchange an offering of some type for the familiar’s aid." —Kelden, The Crooked Path. I realized from reading The Crooked Path that Astor is the closest thing to a familiar spirit that I have. Astor is a spirit with whom I have a very complex and intimate relationship. As a companion, Astor plays a similar role as that of humanoid familiars, in that he assists, comforts, and cares for me (he’s even conferred me to a Sabbat a couple of times). I can’t quite call Astor a familiar, though. He is not an external spirit that I have a partnership with, and he is not only a companion. Whatever his exact nature, he is internal and personal in ways that familiars are not. I interpret him as my Shadow, a personification of the dark and repressed side of my personality. I can also invoke or embody him as a persona, and I usually traverse the Otherworld in his form. He may be a tulpa that I have created, or an independent entity that is somehow attached to or twinned with me. Or some degree of both. I think it makes sense to interpret us as an alchemical rebis. He is my male half. (Elden Ring spoilers: My relationship with Astor is very similar to the relationship between Radagon and Marika./s) This is all to say that witches may have close relationships with spirits that aren’t familiars, per se. I don’t think it’s appropriate to call Astor a familiar because he is part of myself. Patron deities are also not familiars, no matter how close to them you may be. I’ve known other witches who have other kinds of companion spirits, such as their Holy Guardian Angel, or incubi/succubi lovers. I guess whatever the nature of your relationship is, it’s between you and the spirit. Similar to familiars are servitors, which are made from thoughtforms, projections of your own thoughts that have been charged with intention. Familiars are not thoughtforms, because they are independent spirits. Servitors are different from familiars in that you create them, usually to perform a specific task. They’re composed entirely of your own energy. They also don’t have nearly as much autonomy and personality as something like Astor, and you don’t develop a close personal relationship with them. They’re more like the magical equivalent of robots. Since servitors are really a separate subject from familiars, I won’t discuss them in this answer. They’re more comparable to what Kelden calls a “fetch” — an extension of yourself, that may take the form of an animal — that you send out into the world to do your bidding. Servitors are a very convenient means of creating magical “servants” to carry out your will the way familiars sometimes do in folklore. Astor has a whole host of them, which he calls Nightmares, boggart-like monsters that take the shape of shadowy gargoyles. I’m not sure if I can use them to affect the physical world at all, but having them around does make me feel safer. As for how to get a familiar, if you want one, Kelden provides some great advice on the matter that’s inspired by folklore and confessions: "Where do Witches find familiars? Through the examination of folkloric accounts, it becomes evident that there are three chief methods by which one might obtain a familiar spirit. First off, a Witch can be gifted their familiar by the Witch Father, typically after undergoing an initiatory experience. Mother Lakeland, an Ipswich woman accused of Witchcraft in 1645, confessed that after she had signed the Devil’s book, he had given her three familiar spirits (two little dogs and a mole). Joane Wallis, who was tried for Witchcraft a year later, told her persecutors that the Man in Black had sent her two familiars named Grissel and Greedigut who came in the likeness of dogs. The second method of receiving a familiar spirit involves a Witch inheriting it from another individual, such as a family member. Elizabeth Francis, a suspected Witch from Chelmsford, was said to have received a familiar — a white spotted cat named Sathan — from her grandmother. In fact, according to some legends, a Witch had to first successfully pass on their familiar before they could die in peace. If the familiar spirit could not be given away properly, they reportedly hid in hedgerows waiting for a passing Witch to come along and hopefully adopt them. Finally, there are those cases in which familiars appeared to a Witch out of the blue. Accused Essex woman Joan Prentice claimed that she was simply preparing herself for bed when her familiar, in the shape of a ferret named Bid, first spontaneously showed up. Many times, under these circumstances, familiar spirits would first make themselves known when the Witch was in distress. When Tom Reid came to Bessie Dunlop, she had been weeping over the loss of a cow and for the fact that her husband and child were gravely ill. A Cunning Man in the seventeenth century explained that he met his familiar when walking home from work, feeling heavy with sad thoughts concerning his family’s welfare. Regardless of the specific method for procuring one, it is typically the familiar that finds the Witch and not the other way around." —Kelden, The Crooked Path As a first step, I recommend asking whatever more powerful entities you work with for a daemon or other lesser spirit to assist you. If you’re interested in demonolatry, the Ars Goetia lists several demon lords that are known to “give good familiars,” meaning that you can evoke them and ask them to send you a familiar. Or you could go adventuring in the Otherworld and see if you come across one. Or set up a ritual and call one to you, giving a job interview to whichever spirit shows up. From there, make friends with the spirit the way you would a person. I highly recommend having spirit friends.

Shadow Work

Shadow work is the process of acknowledging, coming to terms with, and eventually integrating “dark” or repressed aspects of your personality. Usually, these aspects are repressed because you feel ashamed of them for whatever reason, to the point where you try to disassociate them from your conscious identity. When you encounter them, in yourself or other people, your knee-jerk reaction is, That’s not me, that can’t be me. But it is you. Ignoring your Shadow and disassociating it will not make it go away, which is why it must be addressed and reintegrated into your conscious personality. It’s not easy to do that, for a lot of reasons. First of all, it’s really difficult to realize what these repressed aspects are in the first place because… well… they’re subconscious. In Jungian psychology, the recommended method of doing so was paying attention to projections — if you irrationally hate someone, it may be because they are exhibiting behavior or personality traits that you possess but refuse to acknowledge. If you get defensive when confronted with this person, or when someone suggests you might be like this person, or when you consider if you have similar traits, that tends to be a dead giveaway. Anything you get defensive about likely is rooted in something Shadow-related. A phrase I’ve been using lately is “We are all our own inverses.” I don’t think it’s accurate to say that your Shadow is your opposite. It’s not your opposite, because it’s definitely still you. It’s you, but… backwards. It’s still too much like you to be the polar opposite of you, but it reverses your values, which makes it much more disturbing. For example, I value free will and equality, so my Shadow is a tyrant who elevates and glorifies himself. Your Shadow self is like a dark reflection of your conscious self. It is simultaneously everything you’re not and everything you wish you could be. Because the Shadow conflicts with your perception of yourself on such a personal level, accepting that it is you is absolutely brutal. I say that “if you’re not screaming in anguish, you’re not doing it properly,” and although I say that partially in jest, Shadow work usually does cause an earth-shattering existential crisis the first time. You have to be able to take the high road and admit that your Shadow is you. Embrace it and love it instead of shunning it, and that will give you control over it. Exactly how you do this depends on whatever works best for you. You could use meditation and trance, therapy sessions, some form of divination like automatic writing, masturbation (a lot of Shadow baggage pops up during masturbation if you really let your mind wander, since it is a means of achieving trance and sexuality is often repressed), etc. Just do whatever works for you. I’ve noticed that Shadow work prompts are popular, so here are some tough questions to ask yourself: Why does this trigger me? No, really, why? How do I really feel? Why? What would I be like if I had power? If I could do anything I wanted without being judged and without consequences, what would I do? What are some qualities I hate? When do I exhibit them? How can I use them constructively? What fictional characters do I identify with? Why? What fictional characters do I fear? Why? What are my real motivations? Are my values/beliefs/opinions/ambitions really mine, or do I only have them because I think I should? If I refuse to do something, is it because doing it would clash with my image of myself? Why? Which vices are my worst? Why? Is there anything I should be taking responsibility for? What if I’m the one in the wrong? Am I lying to myself? Why do I feel so much shame around this? Is it self-imposed? Is it external? Do I actually deserve to be punished for this? Would I feel freer and happier without this shame? Do I actually need to do/believe this in order to be a good person? If so, why? This is a thing that I consider a core component of my identity. What sort of person would I be without it? Would I still be me? The important thing is to let the real answers come, and to accept them without judgement. You probably have a lot of psychological defense mechanisms in place to keep your from feeling the full emotional force of the answers, and Shadow work requires you to break through those defensive barriers to find the real truth. It is not an easy thing to do. Shadow work is all about asking why — really getting to the bottom of why you feel and react the way you do, why all of your paradigms exist. Then, once you’ve found your Shadow, you can tame it, and be empowered by it. Through all of this, remember, you are not a bad person. Everything you’ve hidden about yourself is a normal part of who you are, and you must integrate it, no matter how hard it is. You have to control your Shadow, or it will control you. Shadow Work is a huge part of my life, and I don’t regret a moment of it. My own method of dealing with my Shadow was to personify him into a character, whom I am writing in my novel, Shadowbook. Actually, I didn’t create him deliberately… he just surfaced. He told me his name. The name Astor just floated up out of my subconscious and asserted itself. I didn’t decide much about Astor’s appearance, either. I gave him violet cat eyes, but otherwise I made very few conscious decisions about his appearance. (His first iteration had short hair. Oh, the horror! Now he has long, flowing hair and that’s not about to change anytime soon.) Astor is a prince. I did officially decide to make him a prince in my novel, but in hindsight, I realize he was always a prince. What better explains his arrogance, his hedonism and appetite for luxury, his desire to be worshipped, his domineering presence, his desire to subjugate others? And yet, despite all of the ways that Astor and I are opposites, Astor is still me! He has the same aesthetic and appreciation of beauty, the same violent mood swings, the same love of dance and literature (and cats), same passion, same authenticity, same good performance skills but poor social skills, etc. (In the novel, I’ve also given him my sense of empathy, so that he has some redeeming qualities.) He’s my self-insert. I’m still working through some stuff with him (for example, the way he treats women still really disturbs me), but in general, I have become familiar and comfortable with my Shadow. Through writing him, I can engage with my Shadow in a way that’s safe and healthy. In a spiritual sense, Astor has become one of my most valuable assets. Astor is an entity, a twin spirit to mine. He is my constant companion, my familiar, my lover. I interact with Astor on a regular basis and I love him very much. He provides me with information, advice, and emotional support. I have him invoked often, and I usually assume his identity when I astral-travel. I literally would be incomplete without him. Once you’ve worked through your crap and you’re more affiliated with your Shadow, Shadows can actually be fun. You can start to find ways to safely express your darker nature without causing harm to anyone. You can journal, meditate, role play, create art, play aggressive sports or video games, etc. Find outlets for your Shadow so that you can engage with it healthily. The reason why this is important as a spiritual process is because any significant spiritual work requires this intense level of self-awareness. You can’t reach enlightenment if you’re projecting your own demons left and right. You can’t transmute yourself into a higher form if you haven’t addressed the personal baggage you’re dragging around. You can’t do any productive work with darker entities who might drag up, embody, or try to take advantage of your repressed Shadow if you haven’t dealt with it. A dark god will likely slap you in the face with your Shadow to get you to confront it, which is painful (see above), while a demon might manipulate you by playing off of your projections and insecurities. If you’ve done Shadow work, you can move past that. When the villain proclaims, “We’re not so different, you and I,” he expects the hero to be thrown off-guard and have a big existential crisis or mental breakdown. If the hero has done Shadow work, though, his/her response will simply be “Yeah, I know. Are you done?” When confronting the many trials of the spiritual world, you want to be that person.

Sarah McLean in library.jpg

About Sarah McLean

Hi, I'm Sarah McLean. I'm a writer with interests in mythology, religion, literature, and occultism. I spend a lot of my free time writing online articles about these topics, and I also write fantasy novels.

bottom of page